Correlation Between CITIGROUP and Ecolab
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CITIGROUP INC 33 and Ecolab Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CITIGROUP and Ecolab and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CITIGROUP with a short position of Ecolab. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CITIGROUP and Ecolab.
Diversification Opportunities for CITIGROUP and Ecolab
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between CITIGROUP and Ecolab is 0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CITIGROUP INC 33 and Ecolab Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ecolab Inc and CITIGROUP is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CITIGROUP INC 33 are associated (or correlated) with Ecolab. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ecolab Inc has no effect on the direction of CITIGROUP i.e., CITIGROUP and Ecolab go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between CITIGROUP and Ecolab
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon CITIGROUP INC 33 is expected to under-perform the Ecolab. But the bond apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, CITIGROUP INC 33 is 1.26 times less risky than Ecolab. The bond trades about -0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Ecolab Inc is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 24,450 in Ecolab Inc on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 427.00 from holding Ecolab Inc or generate 1.75% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
CITIGROUP INC 33 vs. Ecolab Inc
Performance |
Timeline |
CITIGROUP INC 33 |
Ecolab Inc |
CITIGROUP and Ecolab Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with CITIGROUP and Ecolab
The main advantage of trading using opposite CITIGROUP and Ecolab positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CITIGROUP position performs unexpectedly, Ecolab can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ecolab will offset losses from the drop in Ecolab's long position.CITIGROUP vs. AEP TEX INC | CITIGROUP vs. US BANK NATIONAL | CITIGROUP vs. Jackson Financial | CITIGROUP vs. MetLife |
Ecolab vs. Linde plc Ordinary | Ecolab vs. PPG Industries | Ecolab vs. Sherwin Williams Co | Ecolab vs. LyondellBasell Industries NV |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated |