Correlation Between JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between JPMORGAN CHASE 64 and Uber Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in JPMORGAN with a short position of Uber Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between JPMORGAN and Uber is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding JPMORGAN CHASE 64 and Uber Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Uber Technologies and JPMORGAN is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on JPMORGAN CHASE 64 are associated (or correlated) with Uber Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Uber Technologies has no effect on the direction of JPMORGAN i.e., JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon JPMORGAN is expected to generate 43.54 times less return on investment than Uber Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, JPMORGAN CHASE 64 is 2.75 times less risky than Uber Technologies. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Uber Technologies is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,698  in Uber Technologies on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,498  from holding Uber Technologies or generate 166.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

JPMORGAN CHASE 64  vs.  Uber Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
JPMORGAN CHASE 64 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days JPMORGAN CHASE 64 has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, JPMORGAN is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Uber Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Uber Technologies are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable technical and fundamental indicators, Uber Technologies is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite JPMORGAN and Uber Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if JPMORGAN position performs unexpectedly, Uber Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Uber Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Uber Technologies' long position.
The idea behind JPMORGAN CHASE 64 and Uber Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.

Other Complementary Tools

Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years