Correlation Between California Bond and Stone Harbor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both California Bond and Stone Harbor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining California Bond and Stone Harbor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between California Bond Fund and Stone Harbor Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on California Bond and Stone Harbor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in California Bond with a short position of Stone Harbor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of California Bond and Stone Harbor.

Diversification Opportunities for California Bond and Stone Harbor

0.11
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between California and Stone is 0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding California Bond Fund and Stone Harbor Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Stone Harbor Emerging and California Bond is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on California Bond Fund are associated (or correlated) with Stone Harbor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Stone Harbor Emerging has no effect on the direction of California Bond i.e., California Bond and Stone Harbor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between California Bond and Stone Harbor

Assuming the 90 days horizon California Bond is expected to generate 1.3 times less return on investment than Stone Harbor. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, California Bond Fund is 1.91 times less risky than Stone Harbor. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Stone Harbor Emerging is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  458.00  in Stone Harbor Emerging on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  19.00  from holding Stone Harbor Emerging or generate 4.15% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

California Bond Fund  vs.  Stone Harbor Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
California Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in California Bond Fund are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, California Bond is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Stone Harbor Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Stone Harbor Emerging are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Stone Harbor is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

California Bond and Stone Harbor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with California Bond and Stone Harbor

The main advantage of trading using opposite California Bond and Stone Harbor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if California Bond position performs unexpectedly, Stone Harbor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Stone Harbor will offset losses from the drop in Stone Harbor's long position.
The idea behind California Bond Fund and Stone Harbor Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio