Correlation Between ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between ProShares Ultra Semiconductors and Fidelity Investment Grade, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in ProShares Ultra with a short position of Fidelity Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment

-0.72
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between ProShares and Fidelity is -0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding ProShares Ultra Semiconductors and Fidelity Investment Grade in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Investment Grade and ProShares Ultra is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on ProShares Ultra Semiconductors are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Investment Grade has no effect on the direction of ProShares Ultra i.e., ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment

Considering the 90-day investment horizon ProShares Ultra Semiconductors is expected to under-perform the Fidelity Investment. In addition to that, ProShares Ultra is 9.26 times more volatile than Fidelity Investment Grade. It trades about -0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Investment Grade is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  4,286  in Fidelity Investment Grade on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  33.00  from holding Fidelity Investment Grade or generate 0.77% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

ProShares Ultra Semiconductors  vs.  Fidelity Investment Grade

 Performance 
       Timeline  
ProShares Ultra Semi 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in ProShares Ultra Semiconductors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather fragile basic indicators, ProShares Ultra exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Fidelity Investment Grade 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Fidelity Investment Grade has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Fidelity Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite ProShares Ultra and Fidelity Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if ProShares Ultra position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Investment will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Investment's long position.
The idea behind ProShares Ultra Semiconductors and Fidelity Investment Grade pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm