Correlation Between Visa and LUXOR-B
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Visa Class A and Investeringsselskabet Luxor AS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Visa and LUXOR-B and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Visa with a short position of LUXOR-B. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Visa and LUXOR-B.
Diversification Opportunities for Visa and LUXOR-B
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Visa and LUXOR-B is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Visa Class A and Investeringsselskabet Luxor AS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Investeringsselskabet and Visa is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Visa Class A are associated (or correlated) with LUXOR-B. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Investeringsselskabet has no effect on the direction of Visa i.e., Visa and LUXOR-B go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Visa and LUXOR-B
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Visa is expected to generate 1.77 times less return on investment than LUXOR-B. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Visa Class A is 2.14 times less risky than LUXOR-B. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Investeringsselskabet Luxor AS is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 58,000 in Investeringsselskabet Luxor AS on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 14,500 from holding Investeringsselskabet Luxor AS or generate 25.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Visa Class A vs. Investeringsselskabet Luxor AS
Performance |
Timeline |
Visa Class A |
Investeringsselskabet |
Visa and LUXOR-B Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Visa and LUXOR-B
The main advantage of trading using opposite Visa and LUXOR-B positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Visa position performs unexpectedly, LUXOR-B can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LUXOR-B will offset losses from the drop in LUXOR-B's long position.Visa vs. American Express | Visa vs. PayPal Holdings | Visa vs. Capital One Financial | Visa vs. Upstart Holdings |
LUXOR-B vs. Skjern Bank AS | LUXOR-B vs. Groenlandsbanken AS | LUXOR-B vs. Fynske Bank AS | LUXOR-B vs. Lollands Bank |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data |