Correlation Between Visa and KINDER

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Visa and KINDER at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Visa and KINDER into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Visa Class A and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Visa and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Visa with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Visa and KINDER.

Diversification Opportunities for Visa and KINDER

-0.19
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Visa and KINDER is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Visa Class A and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Visa is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Visa Class A are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of Visa i.e., Visa and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Visa and KINDER

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Visa Class A is expected to generate 1.62 times more return on investment than KINDER. However, Visa is 1.62 times more volatile than KINDER MORGAN ENERGY. It trades about 0.56 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about 0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  31,260  in Visa Class A on November 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,488  from holding Visa Class A or generate 11.16% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy80.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Visa Class A  vs.  KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Visa Class A 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Visa Class A are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Visa may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Visa and KINDER Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Visa and KINDER

The main advantage of trading using opposite Visa and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Visa position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.
Visa vs. American Express
Visa vs. PayPal Holdings
Visa vs. Capital One Financial
Visa vs. Upstart Holdings
The idea behind Visa Class A and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
KINDER vs. Mesa Air Group
KINDER vs. Finnair Oyj
KINDER vs. Acumen Pharmaceuticals
KINDER vs. Corporacion America Airports
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals


 
Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions
 
Feedback Blog
Made with optimal in San Francisco
2024 Macroaxis LLC
COMMON DESTINATIONS
MAIN CATEGORIES
COMPANY