Correlation Between Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure Construction, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Walker Dunlop with a short position of China Infrastructure. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure.
Diversification Opportunities for Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure
-0.35 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Walker and China is -0.35. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure Construct in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Infrastructure and Walker Dunlop is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Walker Dunlop are associated (or correlated) with China Infrastructure. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Infrastructure has no effect on the direction of Walker Dunlop i.e., Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Walker Dunlop is expected to generate 1.21 times less return on investment than China Infrastructure. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Walker Dunlop is 5.69 times less risky than China Infrastructure. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Infrastructure Construction is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 0.11 in China Infrastructure Construction on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.07) from holding China Infrastructure Construction or give up 63.64% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 31.52% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Walker Dunlop vs. China Infrastructure Construct
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Walker Dunlop |
| China Infrastructure |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure
The main advantage of trading using opposite Walker Dunlop and China Infrastructure positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Walker Dunlop position performs unexpectedly, China Infrastructure can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Infrastructure will offset losses from the drop in China Infrastructure's long position.| Walker Dunlop vs. Mr Cooper Group | Walker Dunlop vs. Velocity Financial Llc | Walker Dunlop vs. Security National Financial | Walker Dunlop vs. Encore Capital Group |
| China Infrastructure vs. Medicine Man Technologies | China Infrastructure vs. Kona Gold Solutions | China Infrastructure vs. Green Thumb Industries | China Infrastructure vs. Cann American Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
| Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
| ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
| Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity |