Correlation Between Waste Management and BG Staffing

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Waste Management and BG Staffing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Waste Management and BG Staffing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Waste Management and BG Staffing, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Waste Management and BG Staffing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Waste Management with a short position of BG Staffing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Waste Management and BG Staffing.

Diversification Opportunities for Waste Management and BG Staffing

-0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Waste and BGSF is -0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Waste Management and BG Staffing in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on BG Staffing and Waste Management is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Waste Management are associated (or correlated) with BG Staffing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of BG Staffing has no effect on the direction of Waste Management i.e., Waste Management and BG Staffing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Waste Management and BG Staffing

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Waste Management is expected to generate 0.49 times more return on investment than BG Staffing. However, Waste Management is 2.03 times less risky than BG Staffing. It trades about 0.3 of its potential returns per unit of risk. BG Staffing is currently generating about -0.47 per unit of risk. If you would invest  20,826  in Waste Management on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,143  from holding Waste Management or generate 10.29% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Waste Management  vs.  BG Staffing

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Waste Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Waste Management are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile primary indicators, Waste Management may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
BG Staffing 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days BG Staffing has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Waste Management and BG Staffing Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Waste Management and BG Staffing

The main advantage of trading using opposite Waste Management and BG Staffing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Waste Management position performs unexpectedly, BG Staffing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in BG Staffing will offset losses from the drop in BG Staffing's long position.
The idea behind Waste Management and BG Staffing pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes