Correlation Between Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Clearbridge Energy Mlp and Goldman Sachs Dynamic, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Clearbridge Energy with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs

0.79
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Clearbridge and Goldman is 0.79. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Clearbridge Energy Mlp and Goldman Sachs Dynamic in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Dynamic and Clearbridge Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Clearbridge Energy Mlp are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Dynamic has no effect on the direction of Clearbridge Energy i.e., Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Clearbridge Energy Mlp is expected to generate 1.59 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Clearbridge Energy is 1.59 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Dynamic. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Dynamic is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,369  in Clearbridge Energy Mlp on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,213  from holding Clearbridge Energy Mlp or generate 65.69% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Clearbridge Energy Mlp  vs.  Goldman Sachs Dynamic

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Clearbridge Energy Mlp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Clearbridge Energy Mlp are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Clearbridge Energy showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Goldman Sachs Dynamic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Dynamic are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Clearbridge Energy and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Clearbridge Energy position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Clearbridge Energy Mlp and Goldman Sachs Dynamic pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites