Correlation Between Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Zebra Technologies with a short position of Lloyds Banking. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking.

Diversification Opportunities for Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking

-0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Zebra and Lloyds is -0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Lloyds Banking Group and Zebra Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Zebra Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Lloyds Banking. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Lloyds Banking Group has no effect on the direction of Zebra Technologies i.e., Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Zebra Technologies is expected to generate 1.0 times more return on investment than Lloyds Banking. However, Zebra Technologies is 1.0 times more volatile than Lloyds Banking Group. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Lloyds Banking Group is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,134  in Zebra Technologies on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,779  from holding Zebra Technologies or generate 29.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Zebra Technologies  vs.  Lloyds Banking Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Zebra Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zebra Technologies are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak fundamental drivers, Zebra Technologies may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Lloyds Banking Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lloyds Banking Group are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Lloyds Banking may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking

The main advantage of trading using opposite Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Zebra Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Lloyds Banking can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lloyds Banking will offset losses from the drop in Lloyds Banking's long position.
The idea behind Zebra Technologies and Lloyds Banking Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments