Correlation Between BMO Conservative and IA Clarington

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both BMO Conservative and IA Clarington at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining BMO Conservative and IA Clarington into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between BMO Conservative ETF and IA Clarington Loomis, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on BMO Conservative and IA Clarington and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in BMO Conservative with a short position of IA Clarington. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of BMO Conservative and IA Clarington.

Diversification Opportunities for BMO Conservative and IA Clarington

0.81
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between BMO and IGAF is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding BMO Conservative ETF and IA Clarington Loomis in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on IA Clarington Loomis and BMO Conservative is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on BMO Conservative ETF are associated (or correlated) with IA Clarington. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of IA Clarington Loomis has no effect on the direction of BMO Conservative i.e., BMO Conservative and IA Clarington go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between BMO Conservative and IA Clarington

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon BMO Conservative is expected to generate 1.04 times less return on investment than IA Clarington. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, BMO Conservative ETF is 2.55 times less risky than IA Clarington. It trades about 0.37 of its potential returns per unit of risk. IA Clarington Loomis is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,511  in IA Clarington Loomis on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  46.00  from holding IA Clarington Loomis or generate 3.04% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

BMO Conservative ETF  vs.  IA Clarington Loomis

 Performance 
       Timeline  
BMO Conservative ETF 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in BMO Conservative ETF are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, BMO Conservative is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
IA Clarington Loomis 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in IA Clarington Loomis are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, IA Clarington is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

BMO Conservative and IA Clarington Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with BMO Conservative and IA Clarington

The main advantage of trading using opposite BMO Conservative and IA Clarington positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if BMO Conservative position performs unexpectedly, IA Clarington can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in IA Clarington will offset losses from the drop in IA Clarington's long position.
The idea behind BMO Conservative ETF and IA Clarington Loomis pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios