Correlation Between Zscaler and Shift4 Payments

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Zscaler and Shift4 Payments at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Zscaler and Shift4 Payments into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Zscaler and Shift4 Payments, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Zscaler and Shift4 Payments and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Zscaler with a short position of Shift4 Payments. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Zscaler and Shift4 Payments.

Diversification Opportunities for Zscaler and Shift4 Payments

0.61
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Zscaler and Shift4 is 0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Zscaler and Shift4 Payments in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Shift4 Payments and Zscaler is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Zscaler are associated (or correlated) with Shift4 Payments. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Shift4 Payments has no effect on the direction of Zscaler i.e., Zscaler and Shift4 Payments go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Zscaler and Shift4 Payments

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Zscaler is expected to generate 1.21 times less return on investment than Shift4 Payments. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Zscaler is 1.63 times less risky than Shift4 Payments. It trades about 0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Shift4 Payments is currently generating about 0.24 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9,325  in Shift4 Payments on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,603  from holding Shift4 Payments or generate 17.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Zscaler  vs.  Shift4 Payments

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Zscaler 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zscaler are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively abnormal basic indicators, Zscaler may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Shift4 Payments 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Shift4 Payments are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively uncertain basic indicators, Shift4 Payments reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Zscaler and Shift4 Payments Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Zscaler and Shift4 Payments

The main advantage of trading using opposite Zscaler and Shift4 Payments positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Zscaler position performs unexpectedly, Shift4 Payments can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Shift4 Payments will offset losses from the drop in Shift4 Payments' long position.
The idea behind Zscaler and Shift4 Payments pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios