This module uses fundamental data of Althea Group to approximate its Piotroski F score. Althea Group F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Althea Group Holdings. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Althea Group financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Althea Group Holdings. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
Althea
Piotroski F Score
Sale Purchase Of Stock
Change To Inventory
Investments
Change In Cash
Net Borrowings
Stock Based Compensation
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Depreciation
Other Non Cash Items
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Change To Account Receivables
Change To Operating Activities
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Change To Netincome
Change To Liabilities
Begin Period Cash Flow
Issuance Of Capital Stock
Total Assets
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Net Tangible Assets
Net Debt
Retained Earnings
Accounts Payable
Cash
Cash And Short Term Investments
Net Receivables
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Long Term Debt Total
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Inventory
Other Current Assets
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Liab
Total Current Assets
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Short Term Debt
Common Stock
Short Long Term Debt Total
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Current Deferred Revenue
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Other Assets
Non Current Liabilities Total
Net Invested Capital
Long Term Investments
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Capital Stock
Net Working Capital
Intangible Assets
Property Plant Equipment
Other Liab
Capital Lease Obligations
Non Current Liabilities Other
Depreciation And Amortization
Interest Expense
Selling General Administrative
Selling And Marketing Expenses
Total Revenue
Gross Profit
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Ebit
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Income Tax Expense
Net Interest Income
Interest Income
Reconciled Depreciation
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, Althea Group's Net Debt is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Short and Long Term Debt is likely to gain to about 1.9 M in 2024, whereas Long Term Debt Total is likely to drop slightly above 859.8 K in 2024.
At this time, it appears that Althea Group's Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Althea Group is to make sure Althea is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Althea Group's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Althea Group's financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Althea Group's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Althea Group in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Net Debt
6.52 Million
At this time, Althea Group's Net Debt is comparatively stable compared to the past year.
About Althea Group Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Althea Group Holdings's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Althea Group using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Althea Group Holdings based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
When running Althea Group's price analysis, check to measure Althea Group's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Althea Group is operating at the current time. Most of Althea Group's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Althea Group's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Althea Group's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Althea Group to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.