Federal Agricultural Mortgage Stock EBITDA
| AGM Stock | USD 210.95 5.86 2.86% |
Federal Agricultural Mortgage fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Federal Agricultural's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Federal Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Federal Agricultural's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Federal Agricultural stock.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| EBITDA | 225.5 M | 242.3 M |
Federal | EBITDA |
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Company EBITDA Analysis
Federal Agricultural's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Federal Agricultural EBITDA | 225.49 M |
Most of Federal Agricultural's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Federal Agricultural Mortgage is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Federal EBITDA Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Federal Agricultural is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Federal Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as EBITDA. Since Federal Agricultural's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Federal Agricultural's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Federal Agricultural's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Federal EBITDA Historical Pattern
Today, most investors in Federal Agricultural Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Federal Agricultural's growth ratios. Consistent increases or drops in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's ebitda growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use a static breakdown of Federal Agricultural ebitda as a starting point in their analysis.
Federal Agricultural EBITDA |
| Timeline |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
| Competition |
Federal Ebitda
Ebitda |
|
According to the company disclosure, Federal Agricultural Mortgage reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 225.49 M. This is 99.64% lower than that of the Financial Services sector and 89.16% lower than that of the Financials industry. The ebitda for all United States stocks is 94.22% higher than that of the company.
Federal EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Federal Agricultural's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Federal Agricultural could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Federal Agricultural by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Federal Agricultural is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Federal Agricultural ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Federal Agricultural's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Federal Agricultural's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Federal Agricultural Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Federal Agricultural that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Federal Agricultural's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Federal Agricultural's value.| Shares | American Century Companies Inc | 2024-09-30 | 198.6 K | Loomis, Sayles & Company Lp | 2024-06-30 | 179.7 K | Wellington Management Company Llp | 2024-06-30 | 172.4 K | Rice Hall James & Associates, Llc | 2024-09-30 | 172.1 K | Northern Trust Corp | 2024-09-30 | 122.3 K | Weybosset Research & Management Llc | 2024-09-30 | 110.8 K | Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc | 2024-09-30 | 107.5 K | International Assets Investment Management, Llc | 2024-09-30 | 93.7 K | Renaissance Technologies Corp | 2024-09-30 | 78.4 K | Fmr Inc | 2024-09-30 | 823.2 K | Blackrock Inc | 2024-06-30 | 776.1 K |
Federal Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0067 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.57 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.73 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 30.63 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 9.35 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.50 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 80.80 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 155.35 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 9.87 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 2.18 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 6.24 X | ||||
| Revenue | 346.59 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 305.24 M | ||||
| EBITDA | 225.49 M | ||||
| Net Income | 200 M | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 861 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 85.18 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 27.69 B | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.41 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 96.57 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 375.8 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 4.13 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 15.99 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 1.71 X | ||||
| Target Price | 218.0 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 185 | ||||
| Beta | 1.06 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 2.17 B | ||||
| Total Asset | 29.52 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 823.72 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.03 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 3.31 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 29.52 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 5.3 |
About Federal Agricultural Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Federal Agricultural Mortgage's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Federal Agricultural using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Federal Agricultural Mortgage based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Federal Agricultural Piotroski F Score and Federal Agricultural Altman Z Score analysis. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.
Is Commercial & Residential Mortgage Finance space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Federal Agricultural. If investors know Federal will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Federal Agricultural listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.18) | Dividend Share 5.3 | Earnings Share 15.99 | Revenue Per Share 32.007 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.11) |
The market value of Federal Agricultural is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Federal that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Federal Agricultural's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Federal Agricultural's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Federal Agricultural's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Federal Agricultural's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Federal Agricultural's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Federal Agricultural is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Federal Agricultural's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.