This module uses fundamental data of Brand Engagement to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Brand Engagement M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Brand Engagement Piotroski F Score and Brand Engagement Altman Z Score analysis.
At this time, it appears that Brand Engagement Network is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Brand Engagement's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Brand Engagement executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Brand Engagement's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Brand Engagement's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Brand Engagement's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Brand Engagement in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Brand Engagement's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Brand Engagement Network's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Brand Engagement using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Brand Engagement Network based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
When determining whether Brand Engagement Network is a strong investment it is important to analyze Brand Engagement's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Brand Engagement's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Brand Stock, refer to the following important reports:
You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.
Is IT Consulting & Other Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Brand Engagement. If investors know Brand will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Brand Engagement listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share
(0.35)
Revenue Per Share
0.002
Return On Assets
(0.44)
Return On Equity
(1.12)
The market value of Brand Engagement Network is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Brand that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Brand Engagement's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Brand Engagement's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Brand Engagement's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Brand Engagement's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Brand Engagement's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Brand Engagement is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Brand Engagement's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.