Burning Rock Biotech Stock Total Debt
| BNR Stock | USD 5.56 0.04 0.71% |
Burning Rock Biotech fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Burning Rock's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Burning Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Burning Rock's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Burning Rock stock.
As of 11/26/2024, Total Debt To Capitalization is likely to grow to 0. Burning | Total Debt |
Burning Rock Biotech Company Total Debt Analysis
Burning Rock's Total Debt refers to the amount of long term interest-bearing liabilities that a company carries on its balance sheet. That may include bonds sold to the public, notes written to banks or capital leases. Typically, debt can help a company magnify its earnings, but the burden of interest and principal payments will eventually prevent the firm from borrow excessively.
Current Burning Rock Total Debt | 12.32 M |
Most of Burning Rock's fundamental indicators, such as Total Debt, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Burning Rock Biotech is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Burning Total Debt Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Burning Rock is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Burning Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Total Debt. Since Burning Rock's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Burning Rock's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Burning Rock's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Burning Total Debt Historical Pattern
Today, most investors in Burning Rock Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Burning Rock's growth ratios. Consistent increases or drops in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's total debt growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use a static breakdown of Burning Rock total debt as a starting point in their analysis.
Burning Rock Total Debt |
| Timeline |
In most industries, total debt may also include the current portion of long-term debt. Since debt terms vary widely from one company to another, simply comparing outstanding debt obligations between different companies may not be adequate. It is usually meant to compare total debt amounts between companies that operate within the same sector.
| Competition |
Burning Short Long Term Debt Total
Short Long Term Debt Total |
|
Based on the latest financial disclosure, Burning Rock Biotech has a Total Debt of 12.32 M. This is 99.55% lower than that of the Biotechnology sector and 98.67% lower than that of the Health Care industry. The total debt for all United States stocks is 99.77% higher than that of the company.
Burning Total Debt Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Burning Rock's direct or indirect competition against its Total Debt to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Burning Rock could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Burning Rock by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Burning Rock is currently under evaluation in total debt category among its peers.
Burning Rock Current Valuation Drivers
We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Burning Rock from analyzing Burning Rock's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Burning Rock's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Burning Rock's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
| Market Cap | 148.9B | 103.5B | 63.1B | 16.1B | 704.2M | 669.0M | |
| Enterprise Value | 148.8B | 101.6B | 61.7B | 15.3B | 101.4M | 96.4M |
Burning Rock ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Burning Rock's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Burning Rock's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Burning Rock Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Burning Rock that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Burning Rock's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Burning Rock's value.| Shares | Ubs Group Ag | 2024-06-30 | 2.6 K | Shen Neil Nanpeng | 2024-09-30 | 885 | Rhumbline Advisers | 2024-06-30 | 580 | Tower Research Capital Llc | 2024-06-30 | 261 | Jpmorgan Chase & Co | 2024-06-30 | 120 | Ronald Blue Trust, Inc. | 2024-09-30 | 25.0 | Blackrock Inc | 2024-06-30 | 6.0 | Susquehanna International Group, Llp | 2024-06-30 | 0.0 | Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. | 2024-06-30 | 0.0 | Kynam Capital Management, Lp | 2024-09-30 | 989.2 K | Massachusetts Financial Services Company | 2024-09-30 | 385.4 K |
Burning Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -0.69 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.31 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (1.11) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.82) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | (1.24 M) | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 8.53 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.03 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 60.94 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 83.98 K | ||||
| Price To Book | 0.61 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.11 X | ||||
| Revenue | 537.43 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 380.04 M | ||||
| EBITDA | (517.9 M) | ||||
| Net Income | (653.69 M) | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 1.15 B | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 10.95 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 12.32 M | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 0.05 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 4.07 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 66.07 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (255.78 M) | ||||
| Short Ratio | 1.38 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | (7.64) X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | (2.79) X | ||||
| Target Price | 4.03 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 786 | ||||
| Beta | 0.14 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 57.45 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 1.04 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (3.85 B) | ||||
| Working Capital | 620.73 M | ||||
| Net Asset | 1.04 B |
About Burning Rock Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Burning Rock Biotech's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Burning Rock using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Burning Rock Biotech based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Burning Rock
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Burning Rock position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Burning Rock will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Burning Stock
| 0.51 | MLYS | Mineralys Therapeutics, | PairCorr |
| 0.39 | KZR | Kezar Life Sciences | PairCorr |
| 0.35 | NXGLW | NexGel Warrant | PairCorr |
| 0.32 | KA | Kineta Inc | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Burning Rock could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Burning Rock when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Burning Rock - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Burning Rock Biotech to buy it.
The correlation of Burning Rock is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Burning Rock moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Burning Rock Biotech moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Burning Rock can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Burning Stock Analysis
When running Burning Rock's price analysis, check to measure Burning Rock's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Burning Rock is operating at the current time. Most of Burning Rock's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Burning Rock's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Burning Rock's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Burning Rock to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.