Cascadia Acquisition Corp Stock Z Score
Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product.
Cascadia |
Cascadia Acquisition Corp Company Z Score Analysis
Cascadia Acquisition's Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..
Current Cascadia Acquisition Z Score | -0.22 |
Most of Cascadia Acquisition's fundamental indicators, such as Z Score, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Cascadia Acquisition Corp is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
CompetitionIn accordance with the company's disclosures, Cascadia Acquisition Corp has a Z Score of -0.22. This is 109.13% lower than that of the Capital Markets sector and significantly lower than that of the Financials industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 102.52% higher than that of the company.
Cascadia Z Score Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Cascadia Acquisition's direct or indirect competition against its Z Score to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Cascadia Acquisition could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Cascadia Acquisition by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Cascadia Acquisition is currently under evaluation in z score category among its peers.
Cascadia Fundamentals
Number Of Shares Shorted | 4.34 K | |||
EBITDA | (7.59 M) | |||
Net Income | 6.89 M | |||
Total Debt | 221.78 K | |||
Book Value Per Share | 0.01 X | |||
Cash Flow From Operations | (858.57 K) | |||
Total Asset | 152.39 M | |||
Retained Earnings | (5.38 M) | |||
Working Capital | (201.08 K) | |||
Z Score | -0.22 | |||
Net Asset | 152.39 M |
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.
Other Consideration for investing in Cascadia Stock
If you are still planning to invest in Cascadia Acquisition Corp check if it may still be traded through OTC markets such as Pink Sheets or OTC Bulletin Board. You may also purchase it directly from the company, but this is not always possible and may require contacting the company directly. Please note that delisted stocks are often considered to be more risky investments, as they are no longer subject to the same regulatory and reporting requirements as listed stocks. Therefore, it is essential to carefully research the Cascadia Acquisition's history and understand the potential risks before investing.
Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk |