Carbon Energy Stock EBITDA
| CRBO Stock | USD 0.25 0.00 0.00% |
Carbon Energy fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Carbon Energy's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Carbon Pink Sheet. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Carbon Energy's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Carbon Energy pink sheet.
Carbon |
Carbon Energy Company EBITDA Analysis
Carbon Energy's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Carbon Energy EBITDA | 29.7 M |
Most of Carbon Energy's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Carbon Energy is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
| Competition |
According to the company disclosure, Carbon Energy reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 29.7 M. This is 99.5% lower than that of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels sector and 98.22% lower than that of the Energy industry. The ebitda for all United States stocks is 99.24% higher than that of the company.
Carbon EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Carbon Energy's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the pink sheets which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Carbon Energy could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Carbon Energy by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Carbon Energy is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Carbon Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -0.56 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0281 | |||
| Profit Margin | (0.47) % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.12 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 67.27 M | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 2.08 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 2.54 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 0.22 X | |||
| Price To Book | 0.0008 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 0 X | |||
| Revenue | 116.62 M | |||
| Gross Profit | 42.44 M | |||
| EBITDA | 29.7 M | |||
| Net Income | 1.1 M | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 1.31 M | |||
| Cash Per Share | 0.63 X | |||
| Total Debt | 139.61 M | |||
| Debt To Equity | 1.29 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.12 X | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 12.37 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 18.86 M | |||
| Earnings Per Share | (19.97) X | |||
| Number Of Employees | 215 | |||
| Beta | -1.71 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 103.81 K | |||
| Total Asset | 298.25 M | |||
| Retained Earnings | (38.67 M) | |||
| Working Capital | (8.57 M) | |||
| Current Asset | 2.16 M | |||
| Current Liabilities | 10.73 M | |||
| Net Asset | 298.25 M |
About Carbon Energy Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Carbon Energy's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Carbon Energy using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Carbon Energy based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Carbon Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Carbon Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Carbon Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Carbon Energy could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Carbon Energy when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Carbon Energy - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Carbon Energy to buy it.
The correlation of Carbon Energy is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Carbon Energy moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Carbon Energy moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Carbon Energy can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Other Information on Investing in Carbon Pink Sheet
Carbon Energy financial ratios help investors to determine whether Carbon Pink Sheet is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Carbon with respect to the benefits of owning Carbon Energy security.