| DAT Etf | | | USD 44.31 0.74 1.70% |
This module uses fundamental data of ProShares Big to approximate its Piotroski F score. ProShares Big F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of ProShares Big Data. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about ProShares Big financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out
ProShares Big Altman Z Score,
ProShares Big Correlation,
Portfolio Optimization, as well as analyze
ProShares Big Alpha and Beta and
ProShares Big Hype Analysis.
At this time, it appears that ProShares Big's Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized
Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of
predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
0.0
Piotroski F Score - Inapplicable
| Change in Return on Assets | |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | |
| Change In Outstending Shares | |
ProShares Big Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to ProShares Big is to make sure ProShares is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if ProShares Big's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if ProShares Big's financial numbers are properly reported.
About ProShares Big Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled
Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
About ProShares Big Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze ProShares Big Data's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of ProShares Big using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of ProShares Big Data based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this etf, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
When determining whether ProShares Big Data is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company
management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A
comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if ProShares Etf is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Proshares Big Data Etf.
Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Proshares Big Data Etf: The market value of ProShares Big Data is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of ProShares that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of ProShares Big's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is ProShares Big's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because ProShares Big's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect ProShares Big's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between ProShares Big's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if ProShares Big is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, ProShares Big's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.