Fat Brands Stock Net Income
| FAT Stock | USD 0.26 0.13 33.33% |
As of the 28th of January, FAT Brands shows the Market Risk Adjusted Performance of (23.21), standard deviation of 9.43, and Mean Deviation of 6.15. FAT Brands technical analysis allows you to utilize historical prices and volume patterns in order to determine a pattern that computes the direction of the entity's future prices.
Analyzing historical trends in various income statement and balance sheet accounts from FAT Brands' financial statements helps investors evaluate the company's valuation, profitability, and current liquidity needs. Key fundamental drivers impacting FAT Brands' valuation are summarized below:FAT Brands does not today have any fundamental signals for analysis. This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools. Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of FAT Brands. If investors know FAT will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about FAT Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of FAT Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of FAT that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of FAT Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is FAT Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because FAT Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect FAT Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between FAT Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if FAT Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, FAT Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
FAT Brands 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to FAT Brands' stock what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of FAT Brands.
| 10/30/2025 |
| 01/28/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in FAT Brands on October 30, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding FAT Brands or generate 0.0% return on investment in FAT Brands over 90 days. FAT Brands is related to or competes with Noodles, Rave Restaurant, Ree Automotive, Leslies, Ark Restaurants, Natuzzi SpA, and MKDWELL Tech. FAT Brands Inc., a multi-brand franchising company, acquires, develops, and manages quick service, fast casual, casual d... More
FAT Brands Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure FAT Brands' stock current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess FAT Brands upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Information Ratio | (0.28) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 44.83 | |||
| Value At Risk | (15.62) | |||
| Potential Upside | 11.11 |
FAT Brands Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for FAT Brands' investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as FAT Brands' standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use FAT Brands historical prices to predict the future FAT Brands' volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.19) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (2.62) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (3.49) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (23.22) |
FAT Brands January 28, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.19) | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | (23.21) | |||
| Mean Deviation | 6.15 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | (362.86) | |||
| Standard Deviation | 9.43 | |||
| Variance | 88.87 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.28) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (2.62) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (3.49) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (23.22) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 44.83 | |||
| Value At Risk | (15.62) | |||
| Potential Upside | 11.11 | |||
| Skewness | (1.66) | |||
| Kurtosis | 5.14 |
FAT Brands Backtested Returns
FAT Brands secures Sharpe Ratio (or Efficiency) of -0.28, which denotes the company had a -0.28 % return per unit of volatility over the last 3 months. FAT Brands exposes twenty-three different technical indicators, which can help you to evaluate volatility embedded in its price movement. Please confirm FAT Brands' Mean Deviation of 6.15, standard deviation of 9.43, and Market Risk Adjusted Performance of (23.21) to check the risk estimate we provide. The firm shows a Beta (market volatility) of 0.11, which means not very significant fluctuations relative to the market. As returns on the market increase, FAT Brands' returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during the bear market, the loss of holding FAT Brands is expected to be smaller as well. At this point, FAT Brands has a negative expected return of -2.62%. Please make sure to confirm FAT Brands' treynor ratio, kurtosis, as well as the relationship between the Kurtosis and day typical price , to decide if FAT Brands performance from the past will be repeated in the future.
Auto-correlation | 0.24 |
Weak predictability
FAT Brands has weak predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between FAT Brands time series from 30th of October 2025 to 14th of December 2025 and 14th of December 2025 to 28th of January 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of FAT Brands price movement. The serial correlation of 0.24 indicates that over 24.0% of current FAT Brands price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.24 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.26 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 0.0 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Based on the recorded statements, FAT Brands reported net income of (189.85 Million). This is 137.18% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 162.31% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The net income for all United States stocks is 133.25% higher than that of the company.
FAT Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses FAT Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of FAT Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing FAT Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.FAT Brands is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
FAT Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -1.57 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0243 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.39) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.11) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.49 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 16.67 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 67.47 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 6.76 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 968.67 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 16.21 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 12.81 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.01 X | ||||
| Revenue | 592.65 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 141.6 M | ||||
| EBITDA | (12.82 M) | ||||
| Net Income | (189.85 M) | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 23.91 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 1.44 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 1.47 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 7.20 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 0.41 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | (34.94) X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (56.25 M) | ||||
| Short Ratio | 2.36 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | (13.36) X | ||||
| Target Price | 10.0 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 2.09 K | ||||
| Beta | 1.22 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 7.27 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 1.29 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (458.62 M) | ||||
| Working Capital | (210.28 M) | ||||
| Current Asset | 1.99 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 13.48 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.41 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 1.29 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.14 |
About FAT Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze FAT Brands's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of FAT Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of FAT Brands based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Thematic Opportunities
Explore Investment Opportunities
Additional Tools for FAT Stock Analysis
When running FAT Brands' price analysis, check to measure FAT Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy FAT Brands is operating at the current time. Most of FAT Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of FAT Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move FAT Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of FAT Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.