This module uses fundamental data of FAT Brands to approximate its Piotroski F score. FAT Brands F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of FAT Brands. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about FAT Brands financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out FAT Brands Altman Z Score, FAT Brands Correlation, FAT Brands Valuation, as well as analyze FAT Brands Alpha and Beta and FAT Brands Hype Analysis.
At present, FAT Brands' Net Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Short and Long Term Debt Total is expected to grow to about 1.5 B, whereas Long Term Debt is forecasted to decline to about 562.9 M. At present, FAT Brands' Cash Per Share is projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Income Quality is expected to grow to 0.37, whereas Price To Sales Ratio is forecasted to decline to 0.23.
At this time, it appears that FAT Brands' Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to FAT Brands is to make sure FAT is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if FAT Brands' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if FAT Brands' financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between FAT Brands' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards FAT Brands in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Book Value Per Share
(16.84)
At present, FAT Brands' Book Value Per Share is projected to drop based on the last few years of reporting.
FAT Brands ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, FAT Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to FAT Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About FAT Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze FAT Brands's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of FAT Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of FAT Brands based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
When determining whether FAT Brands is a strong investment it is important to analyze FAT Brands' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact FAT Brands' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding FAT Stock, refer to the following important reports:
For information on how to trade FAT Stock refer to our How to Trade FAT Stock guide.You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of FAT Brands. If investors know FAT will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about FAT Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Dividend Share
0.56
Earnings Share
(9.22)
Revenue Per Share
35.787
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.311
Return On Assets
(0.02)
The market value of FAT Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of FAT that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of FAT Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is FAT Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because FAT Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect FAT Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between FAT Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if FAT Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, FAT Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.