This module uses fundamental data of FitLife Brands, to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. FitLife Brands, M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out FitLife Brands, Piotroski F Score and FitLife Brands, Altman Z Score analysis.
FitLife
Beneish M Score
Market Cap
Enterprise Value
Price To Sales Ratio
Ptb Ratio
Days Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per Share
Free Cash Flow Yield
Operating Cash Flow Per Share
Average Payables
Stock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To Depreciation
Pb Ratio
Ev To Sales
Free Cash Flow Per Share
Roic
Inventory Turnover
Net Income Per Share
Days Of Inventory On Hand
Payables Turnover
Sales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average Inventory
Research And Ddevelopement To Revenue
Capex To Revenue
Cash Per Share
Pocfratio
Interest Coverage
Capex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf Ratio
Days Payables Outstanding
Income Quality
Roe
Ev To Operating Cash Flow
Pe Ratio
Return On Tangible Assets
Ev To Free Cash Flow
Earnings Yield
Intangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To E B I T D A
Current Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Receivables Turnover
Graham Number
Shareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To Equity
Capex Per Share
Graham Net Net
Average Receivables
Revenue Per Share
Interest Debt Per Share
Debt To Assets
Enterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Short Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings Ratio
Operating Cycle
Price Book Value Ratio
Price Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables Outstanding
Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Pretax Profit Margin
Ebt Per Ebit
Operating Profit Margin
Effective Tax Rate
Company Equity Multiplier
Long Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To Capitalization
Return On Capital Employed
Debt Equity Ratio
Ebit Per Revenue
Quick Ratio
Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Net Income Per E B T
Cash Ratio
Cash Conversion Cycle
Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio
Days Of Inventory Outstanding
Days Of Sales Outstanding
Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Cash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book Ratio
Fixed Asset Turnover
Capital Expenditure Coverage Ratio
Price Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value Multiple
Debt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio
Price Sales Ratio
Return On Assets
Asset Turnover
Net Profit Margin
Gross Profit Margin
Price Fair Value
Return On Equity
Change In Cash
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Depreciation
Other Non Cash Items
Change To Liabilities
Sale Purchase Of Stock
Change To Inventory
Change To Account Receivables
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities
Other Cashflows From Investing Activities
Change To Netincome
Investments
Change Receivables
Net Borrowings
Cash And Cash Equivalents Changes
Cash Flows Other Operating
Change To Operating Activities
Stock Based Compensation
Dividends Paid
Total Assets
Short Long Term Debt Total
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Net Debt
Retained Earnings
Accounts Payable
Cash
Non Current Assets Total
Cash And Short Term Investments
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Total Liab
Total Current Assets
Intangible Assets
Common Stock
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Other Stockholder Equity
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Property Plant Equipment
Non Currrent Assets Other
Other Assets
Net Receivables
Other Current Assets
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Preferred Stock Total Equity
Long Term Debt
Inventory
Short Term Debt
Current Deferred Revenue
Net Tangible Assets
Common Stock Total Equity
Long Term Debt Total
Capital Surpluse
Short Long Term Debt
Treasury Stock
Non Current Liabilities Other
Net Invested Capital
Net Working Capital
Capital Stock
Capital Lease Obligations
Interest Expense
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Ebit
Research Development
Ebitda
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Depreciation And Amortization
Selling General Administrative
Total Revenue
Gross Profit
Cost Of Revenue
Reconciled Depreciation
Income Tax Expense
Selling And Marketing Expenses
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Non Operating Income Net Other
Tax Provision
Net Interest Income
Interest Income
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, FitLife Brands,'s Long Term Debt is most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. The FitLife Brands,'s current Short Term Debt is estimated to increase to about 4.9 M, while Long Term Debt Total is projected to decrease to roughly 387.3 K. At this time, FitLife Brands,'s Free Cash Flow Yield is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. The FitLife Brands,'s current Operating Cash Flow Per Share is estimated to increase to 0.99, while Days Sales Outstanding is projected to decrease to 20.17.
At this time, it appears that FitLife Brands, Common is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if FitLife Brands,'s top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by FitLife Brands, executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of FitLife Brands,'s earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if FitLife Brands,'s auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
FitLife Brands, Common Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between FitLife Brands,'s different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards FitLife Brands, in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find FitLife Brands,'s degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Depreciation And Amortization
148,498
At this time, FitLife Brands,'s Depreciation And Amortization is most likely to decrease significantly in the upcoming years.
FitLife Brands, Earnings Manipulation Drivers
Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as FitLife Brands,. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, FitLife Brands,'s sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to FitLife Brands,'s managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About FitLife Brands, Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze FitLife Brands, Common's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of FitLife Brands, using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of FitLife Brands, Common based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
When determining whether FitLife Brands, Common is a strong investment it is important to analyze FitLife Brands,'s competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact FitLife Brands,'s future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding FitLife Stock, refer to the following important reports:
You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.
Is Personal Care Products space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of FitLife Brands,. If investors know FitLife will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about FitLife Brands, listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.325
Earnings Share
1.62
Revenue Per Share
13.316
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.147
Return On Assets
0.1414
The market value of FitLife Brands, Common is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of FitLife that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of FitLife Brands,'s value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is FitLife Brands,'s true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because FitLife Brands,'s market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect FitLife Brands,'s underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between FitLife Brands,'s value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if FitLife Brands, is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, FitLife Brands,'s price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.