Galaxy Gaming Stock EBITDA
| GLXZ Stock | USD 2.74 0.03 1.08% |
Galaxy Gaming fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Galaxy Gaming's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Galaxy OTC Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Galaxy Gaming's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Galaxy Gaming otc stock.
Galaxy |
Galaxy Gaming OTC Stock EBITDA Analysis
Galaxy Gaming's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Galaxy Gaming EBITDA | 6.75 M |
Most of Galaxy Gaming's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Galaxy Gaming is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
| Competition |
According to the company disclosure, Galaxy Gaming reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 6.75 M. This is 99.34% lower than that of the Consumer Cyclical sector and 96.5% lower than that of the Gambling industry. The ebitda for all United States stocks is 99.83% higher than that of the company.
Galaxy EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Galaxy Gaming's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the otc stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Galaxy Gaming could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Galaxy Gaming by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Galaxy Gaming is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Galaxy Gaming ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Galaxy Gaming's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Galaxy Gaming's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Galaxy Fundamentals
| Return On Asset | 0.0949 | |||
| Profit Margin | (0.05) % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.25 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 98.07 M | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 24.25 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 25.61 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 1.09 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 140.00 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 2.65 X | |||
| Revenue | 19.98 M | |||
| Gross Profit | 19.9 M | |||
| EBITDA | 6.75 M | |||
| Net Income | 2.11 M | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 17.25 M | |||
| Cash Per Share | 0.71 X | |||
| Total Debt | 52.14 M | |||
| Debt To Equity | 123.60 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 5.31 X | |||
| Book Value Per Share | (0.76) X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 6 M | |||
| Earnings Per Share | 0.02 X | |||
| Target Price | 0.75 | |||
| Number Of Employees | 36 | |||
| Beta | 1.52 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 67.91 M | |||
| Total Asset | 40.45 M | |||
| Retained Earnings | (34.33 M) | |||
| Working Capital | (4.89 M) | |||
| Current Asset | 3.06 M | |||
| Current Liabilities | 7.95 M | |||
| Z Score | 0.6 | |||
| Net Asset | 40.45 M |
About Galaxy Gaming Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Galaxy Gaming's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Galaxy Gaming using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Galaxy Gaming based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this otc stock, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Additional Tools for Galaxy OTC Stock Analysis
When running Galaxy Gaming's price analysis, check to measure Galaxy Gaming's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Galaxy Gaming is operating at the current time. Most of Galaxy Gaming's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Galaxy Gaming's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Galaxy Gaming's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Galaxy Gaming to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.