Healthstream Stock Z Score

HSTM Stock  USD 31.82  0.52  1.66%   
Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out HealthStream Piotroski F Score and HealthStream Valuation analysis.
To learn how to invest in HealthStream Stock, please use our How to Invest in HealthStream guide.
  
At this time, HealthStream's Net Invested Capital is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 22nd of November 2024, Capital Lease Obligations is likely to grow to about 20.6 M, while Capital Stock is likely to drop about 216.4 M. At this time, HealthStream's EBIT is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 22nd of November 2024, Research Development is likely to grow to about 47.8 M, while Income Tax Expense is likely to drop about 1.8 M.

HealthStream Company Z Score Analysis

HealthStream's Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..

Z Score

 = 

Sum Of

5 Factors

More About Z Score | All Equity Analysis

First Factor

 = 

1.2 * (

Working Capital

/

Total Assets )

Second Factor

 = 

1.4 * (

Retained Earnings

/

Total Assets )

Thrid Factor

 = 

3.3 * (

EBITAD

/

Total Assets )

Fouth Factor

 = 

0.6 * (

Market Value of Equity

/

Total Liabilities )

Fifth Factor

 = 

0.99 * (

Revenue

/

Total Assets )

HealthStream Z Score Driver Correlations

Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for HealthStream is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of HealthStream Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Z Score. Since HealthStream's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of HealthStream's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of HealthStream's interrelated accounts and indicators.
1.00.030.850.530.760.980.410.320.60.89-0.020.760.97-0.52-0.210.80.29-0.830.75-0.54-0.53
1.0-0.020.820.550.770.960.460.350.570.920.020.730.96-0.54-0.170.770.27-0.830.72-0.49-0.49
0.03-0.020.39-0.5-0.190.13-0.84-0.630.4-0.29-0.50.440.070.36-0.840.40.310.210.37-0.79-0.55
0.850.820.390.160.420.9-0.05-0.090.80.53-0.380.940.83-0.14-0.50.930.45-0.550.93-0.77-0.79
0.530.55-0.50.160.630.470.730.95-0.180.70.33-0.020.48-0.390.53-0.010.08-0.730.110.20.3
0.760.77-0.190.420.630.720.620.520.160.870.240.280.81-0.61-0.040.41-0.1-0.870.19-0.25-0.06
0.980.960.130.90.470.720.310.240.640.81-0.120.810.97-0.47-0.290.840.31-0.810.81-0.63-0.59
0.410.46-0.84-0.050.730.620.310.75-0.140.710.67-0.140.39-0.620.65-0.04-0.33-0.63-0.120.490.35
0.320.35-0.63-0.090.950.520.240.75-0.410.580.33-0.240.25-0.370.68-0.260.08-0.55-0.110.40.54
0.60.570.40.8-0.180.160.64-0.14-0.410.29-0.160.830.63-0.19-0.60.880.14-0.240.79-0.64-0.91
0.890.92-0.290.530.70.870.810.710.580.290.270.450.86-0.710.070.510.09-0.850.42-0.22-0.18
-0.020.02-0.5-0.380.330.24-0.120.670.33-0.160.27-0.390.02-0.370.49-0.23-0.69-0.24-0.440.570.36
0.760.730.440.94-0.020.280.81-0.14-0.240.830.45-0.390.73-0.22-0.590.950.41-0.420.93-0.79-0.82
0.970.960.070.830.480.810.970.390.250.630.860.020.73-0.53-0.30.810.17-0.870.69-0.57-0.57
-0.52-0.540.36-0.14-0.39-0.61-0.47-0.62-0.37-0.19-0.71-0.37-0.22-0.53-0.01-0.290.30.48-0.160.080.1
-0.21-0.17-0.84-0.50.53-0.04-0.290.650.68-0.60.070.49-0.59-0.3-0.01-0.62-0.11-0.05-0.430.860.74
0.80.770.40.93-0.010.410.84-0.04-0.260.880.51-0.230.950.81-0.29-0.620.19-0.510.86-0.76-0.86
0.290.270.310.450.08-0.10.31-0.330.080.140.09-0.690.410.170.3-0.110.19-0.010.54-0.42-0.22
-0.83-0.830.21-0.55-0.73-0.87-0.81-0.63-0.55-0.24-0.85-0.24-0.42-0.870.48-0.05-0.51-0.01-0.390.240.18
0.750.720.370.930.110.190.81-0.12-0.110.790.42-0.440.930.69-0.16-0.430.860.54-0.39-0.71-0.81
-0.54-0.49-0.79-0.770.2-0.25-0.630.490.4-0.64-0.220.57-0.79-0.570.080.86-0.76-0.420.24-0.710.77
-0.53-0.49-0.55-0.790.3-0.06-0.590.350.54-0.91-0.180.36-0.82-0.570.10.74-0.86-0.220.18-0.810.77
Click cells to compare fundamentals
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Competition

According to the company's disclosures, HealthStream has a Z Score of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Health Care Technology sector and about the same as Health Care (which currently averages 0.0) industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.

HealthStream Z Score Peer Comparison

Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses HealthStream's direct or indirect competition against its Z Score to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of HealthStream could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing HealthStream by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.
HealthStream is currently under evaluation in z score category among its peers.

HealthStream ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, HealthStream's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to HealthStream's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

HealthStream Institutional Holders

Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in HealthStream that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of HealthStream's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing HealthStream's value.
Shares
Heartland Advisors Inc2024-09-30
318.4 K
Northern Trust Corp2024-09-30
270.2 K
Bank Of New York Mellon Corp2024-06-30
241.9 K
Ameriprise Financial Inc2024-06-30
234.1 K
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc2024-09-30
218.4 K
Nuveen Asset Management, Llc2024-06-30
216.3 K
Panagora Asset Management Inc2024-09-30
212.1 K
Assenagon Asset Management Sa2024-09-30
201.6 K
Amvescap Plc.2024-06-30
198.5 K
Blackrock Inc2024-06-30
M
Vanguard Group Inc2024-09-30
M

HealthStream Fundamentals

About HealthStream Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze HealthStream's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of HealthStream using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of HealthStream based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect
When determining whether HealthStream is a strong investment it is important to analyze HealthStream's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact HealthStream's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding HealthStream Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out HealthStream Piotroski F Score and HealthStream Valuation analysis.
To learn how to invest in HealthStream Stock, please use our How to Invest in HealthStream guide.
You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Is Health Care Technology space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of HealthStream. If investors know HealthStream will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about HealthStream listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.494
Dividend Share
0.109
Earnings Share
0.65
Revenue Per Share
9.485
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.039
The market value of HealthStream is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of HealthStream that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of HealthStream's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is HealthStream's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because HealthStream's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect HealthStream's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between HealthStream's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if HealthStream is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, HealthStream's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.