ALPS International Sector ETF Key Technical Indicators
| IDOG ETF | USD 42.95 0.39 0.92% |
Momentum
OversoldOverbought
0 · Capitulated
As of the 10th of May, ALPS International maintains a quoted price of 42.95 per share. Short-term indicators show risk adjusted performance of 0.0523, and Mean Deviation of 0.7974. The model measures trend continuation and reversal probability using historical patterns. Comparative analytics measure deviation from sector averages.
To filter funds by specific portfolio and distribution criteria, continue to Fund Screeners. Screening criteria include distribution profile, return history, and price-based behavior.ALPS International's One Year Return is the annualized return generated from holding a security for exactly 12 months. The measure is considered to be a good short-term indicator of fund performance. In other words, it represents the capital appreciation of fund investments over the last year. However when the market is volatile such as in recent years, One Year Return measure can be misleading.
One Year Return | = | (Mean of Monthly Returns - 1) | X | 100% |
Current ALPS International One Year Return | 38.10 % |
For ALPS International, One Year Return is most useful as one supporting data point within a fund-level valuation review. Because investors are buying portfolio exposure rather than an operating business, fund valuation relies more heavily on NAV-related measures and distribution characteristics.
| Competition |
ALPS International Sector Fund Metrics Relationships
Main Technical Indicators as of May 10, 2026
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0523 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0743 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 0.7974 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 1.1 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 1.21 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 1871.35 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 1.04 | |||
| Variance | 1.08 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.0459 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.0471 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.0479 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.0394 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.0643 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 4.71 | |||
| Value At Risk | -1.75 | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.49 | |||
| Downside Variance | 1.47 | |||
| Semi Variance | 1.21 | |||
| Expected Short fall | -0.77 | |||
| Skewness | -0.55 | |||
| Kurtosis | 0.558 |
Daily Market Strength Indicators
Accumulation/Distribution and Balance of Power for ALPS International reveal whether buying or selling pressure dominates recent sessions. Balance of Power trending positive indicates that buyers are consistently closing ALPS International near session highs. These signals help explain whether price direction and session structure are moving together for ALPS International. Combine market strength readings with the price and volatility measures above for a more complete analytical picture of ALPS International.
Basic Forecasting Models
Relative Strength Index values for ALPS measure the speed and magnitude of recent price changes. Recognizing these clusters in ALPS International's returns informs position size and stop-loss calibration. Candlestick pattern analysis of ALPS ETF daily data reveals short-term reversal or continuation signals. Identifying these patterns in ALPS ETF data supports better trade timing.ALPS International Comparable Funds
The related funds below provide a category-based comparison set for ALPS International's. This peer set gives investors a way to compare ALPS International's structure and outcomes against similar portfolio vehicles.
| Risk & Return | Correlation |
One Year Return Peer Comparison
A One Year Return comparison for ALPS International works best when it is framed against similar funds rather than operating companies. Differences in ALPS International's One Year Return versus peer funds can reflect portfolio mix, leverage policy, or accounting presentation rather than operating strength. Fund analysis usually places more weight on NAV trend, discount or premium behavior, expense ratio, and distribution sustainability. This peer comparison adds context, but it should support rather than replace a fund-level review.ALPS International is currently under evaluation in one year return relative to comparable ETFs.
Fund Metrics Relationships
Fund Asset Allocation for ALPS International
The fund invests 99.31% of asset under management in tradable equity instruments, with the rest of investments concentrated in various types of exotic instruments.Asset allocation determines how ALPS International's portfolio is distributed across different investment categories. A well-structured allocation aligned with investor risk tolerance can improve aggregate portfolio outcomes. Each asset class in ALPS International's portfolio serves a distinct role in managing risk and generating returns. This approach supports managing volatility while maintaining competitive return potential.
A mutual fund's asset allocation reflects its investment mandate and the types of securities it targets. The fund manager is responsible for adjusting this allocation as market conditions shift over time. Understanding a fund's allocation clarifies whether it aligns with specific risk and return goals. Review the fund's allocation alongside its stated objective to assess consistency and manager discipline.
Important Fund Metrics
| Equity Positions Weight | 99.31 % | |||
| Three Year Return | 20.20 % | |||
| Net Asset | 149.35 M | |||
| Five Year Return | 13.80 % | |||
| One Year Return | 38.10 % | |||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.21 | |||
| Ten Year Return | 11.00 % |
Financial Metrics, Fundamentals & Methodology
ALPS International can be interpreted through its benchmark linkage and allocation profile. Discount/premium regimes may widen during volatility spikes or liquidity fragmentation.
ALPS International Sector analytics rely on fund disclosures and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied. Income statement, balance sheet, and cash-flow values follow GAAP or IFRS conventions as reported.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Michael Smolkin, Member of Macroaxis Board of Directors