This module uses fundamental data of Innodata to approximate its Piotroski F score. Innodata F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Innodata. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Innodata financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Innodata Altman Z Score, Innodata Correlation, Innodata Valuation, as well as analyze Innodata Alpha and Beta and Innodata Hype Analysis.
At this time, it appears that Innodata's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Innodata is to make sure Innodata is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Innodata's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Innodata's financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Innodata's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Innodata in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Book Value Per Share
0.78
At present, Innodata's Book Value Per Share is projected to slightly decrease based on the last few years of reporting.
Innodata ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Innodata's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Innodata's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About Innodata Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Innodata's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Innodata using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Innodata based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
When determining whether Innodata is a strong investment it is important to analyze Innodata's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Innodata's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Innodata Stock, refer to the following important reports:
For information on how to trade Innodata Stock refer to our How to Trade Innodata Stock guide.You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.
Is Data Processing & Outsourced Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Innodata. If investors know Innodata will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Innodata listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
50
Earnings Share
0.11
Revenue Per Share
4.764
Quarterly Revenue Growth
1.356
Return On Assets
0.1351
The market value of Innodata is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Innodata that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Innodata's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Innodata's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Innodata's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Innodata's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Innodata's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Innodata is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Innodata's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.