Iron Mountain Incorporated Stock Piotroski F Score

IRM Stock  USD 119.10  0.37  0.31%   
This module uses fundamental data of Iron Mountain to approximate its Piotroski F score. Iron Mountain F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Iron Mountain Incorporated. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Iron Mountain financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Iron Mountain Altman Z Score, Iron Mountain Correlation, Iron Mountain Valuation, as well as analyze Iron Mountain Alpha and Beta and Iron Mountain Hype Analysis.
  
At this time, Iron Mountain's Debt To Equity is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of November 2024, Interest Debt Per Share is likely to grow to 54.29, while Debt To Assets are likely to drop 0.50. At this time, Iron Mountain's PB Ratio is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of November 2024, EV To Sales is likely to grow to 6.70, while Book Value Per Share is likely to drop 1.27.
At this time, it appears that Iron Mountain's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
6.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
Current Return On Assets

Positive

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Increased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Positive

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Improving

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Decrease

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Higher Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Decrease

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

No Change

Focus

Iron Mountain Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Iron Mountain is to make sure Iron is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Iron Mountain's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Iron Mountain's financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Return On Assets0.01250.0105
Fairly Up
Pretty Stable
Asset Turnover0.450.3136
Way Up
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.430.5698
Way Down
Very volatile
Net Debt15.3 B14.6 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities2.3 B2.2 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total15.6 B14.8 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Assets18.3 B17.5 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets932.3 M1.7 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Cash From Operating Activities1.2 B1.1 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile

Iron Mountain F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Iron Mountain's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Iron Mountain in a much-optimized way.

About Iron Mountain Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Common Stock Shares Outstanding

224.73 Million

At this time, Iron Mountain's Common Stock Shares Outstanding is very stable compared to the past year.

Iron Mountain ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Iron Mountain's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Iron Mountain's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Iron Mountain Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Iron Mountain Incorporated's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Iron Mountain using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Iron Mountain Incorporated based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect
When determining whether Iron Mountain is a strong investment it is important to analyze Iron Mountain's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Iron Mountain's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Iron Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Iron Mountain Altman Z Score, Iron Mountain Correlation, Iron Mountain Valuation, as well as analyze Iron Mountain Alpha and Beta and Iron Mountain Hype Analysis.
You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.
Is Other Specialized REITs space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Iron Mountain. If investors know Iron will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Iron Mountain listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
308.278
Dividend Share
2.634
Earnings Share
0.36
Revenue Per Share
20.438
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.122
The market value of Iron Mountain is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Iron that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Iron Mountain's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Iron Mountain's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Iron Mountain's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Iron Mountain's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Iron Mountain's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Iron Mountain is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Iron Mountain's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.