Kimberly Clark Stock Beneish M Score

KMB Stock  USD 139.14  0.72  0.52%   
This module uses fundamental data of Kimberly Clark to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Kimberly Clark M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Kimberly Clark Piotroski F Score and Kimberly Clark Altman Z Score analysis.
For information on how to trade Kimberly Stock refer to our How to Trade Kimberly Stock guide.
  
At present, Kimberly Clark's Short Term Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Short and Long Term Debt is expected to grow to about 664.4 M, whereas Short and Long Term Debt Total is forecasted to decline to about 4.8 B. At present, Kimberly Clark's PTB Ratio is projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Operating Cash Flow Per Share is expected to grow to 10.98, whereas Price To Sales Ratio is forecasted to decline to 1.38.
At this time, it appears that Kimberly Clark is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Kimberly Clark's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Kimberly Clark executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Kimberly Clark's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-2.57
Beneish M Score - Unlikely Manipulator
Elasticity of Receivables

1.17

Focus
Asset Quality

0.78

Focus
Expense Coverage

1.13

Focus
Gross Margin Strengs

1.16

Focus
Accruals Factor

1.13

Focus
Depreciation Resistance

1.02

Focus
Net Sales Growth

0.77

Focus
Financial Leverage Condition

0.77

Focus

Kimberly Clark Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends

The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Kimberly Clark's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Net Receivables1.9 B2.1 B
Moderately Down
Pretty Stable
Total Revenue15.8 B20.4 B
Significantly Down
Pretty Stable
Total Assets14.5 B17.3 B
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Total Current Assets4.5 B5.7 B
Significantly Down
Pretty Stable
Non Current Assets Total10 B11.6 B
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Property Plant Equipment8.5 B9.1 B
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Depreciation And Amortization687.5 M753 M
Significantly Down
Very volatile
Selling General Administrative3.4 B3.9 B
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Total Current Liabilities4.7 B6.9 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total6.1 B9.3 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Net Debt4.3 BB
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Short Term Debt887.2 M697 M
Significantly Up
Very volatile
Long Term Debt4.7 B7.4 B
Way Down
Pretty Stable
Operating Income2.2 B2.3 B
Notably Down
Pretty Stable
Total Cash From Operating Activities2.5 B3.5 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Long Term Investments278.1 M306 M
Moderately Down
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.40.3442
Fairly Up
Very volatile

Kimberly Clark Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Kimberly Clark's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Kimberly Clark in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Kimberly Clark's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.

About Kimberly Clark Beneish M Score

M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.

Other Operating Expenses

13.51 Billion

At present, Kimberly Clark's Other Operating Expenses is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.

Kimberly Clark Earnings Manipulation Drivers

Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Kimberly Clark. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
201920202021202220232024 (projected)
Net Receivables2.3B2.2B2.2B2.3B2.1B1.9B
Total Revenue18.5B19.1B19.4B20.2B20.4B15.8B
Total Assets15.3B17.5B17.8B18.0B17.3B14.5B
Total Current Assets5.1B5.2B5.6B5.7B5.7B4.5B
Net Debt7.3B8.1B8.3B8.0B7.0B4.3B
Short Term Debt1.5B486M433M844M697M887.2M
Long Term Debt29M7.9B8.1B7.8B7.4B4.7B
Operating Income3.0B3.2B2.6B2.7B2.3B2.2B
Investments(568M)(63M)(82M)(785M)(534M)(507.3M)

Kimberly Clark ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Kimberly Clark's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Kimberly Clark's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Kimberly Clark Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Kimberly Clark's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Kimberly Clark using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Kimberly Clark based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
When determining whether Kimberly Clark offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Kimberly Clark's financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Kimberly Clark Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Kimberly Clark Stock:
Check out Kimberly Clark Piotroski F Score and Kimberly Clark Altman Z Score analysis.
For information on how to trade Kimberly Stock refer to our How to Trade Kimberly Stock guide.
You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Is Household Products space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Kimberly Clark. If investors know Kimberly will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Kimberly Clark listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.555
Dividend Share
4.84
Earnings Share
7.72
Revenue Per Share
59.675
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.04)
The market value of Kimberly Clark is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Kimberly that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Kimberly Clark's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Kimberly Clark's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Kimberly Clark's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Kimberly Clark's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Kimberly Clark's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Kimberly Clark is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Kimberly Clark's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.