KMLM Etf | | | USD 27.84 0.14 0.51% |
This module uses fundamental data of KFA Mount to approximate its Piotroski F score. KFA Mount F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of KFA Mount Lucas. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about KFA Mount financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out
KFA Mount Altman Z Score,
KFA Mount Correlation,
Portfolio Optimization, as well as analyze
KFA Mount Alpha and Beta and
KFA Mount Hype Analysis.
At this time, it appears that KFA Mount's Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized
Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of
predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
0.0
Piotroski F Score - Inapplicable
| Current Return On Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Change in Return on Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | N/A | Focus |
| Asset Turnover Growth | N/A | Focus |
| Current Ratio Change | N/A | Focus |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | N/A | Focus |
| Change In Outstending Shares | N/A | Focus |
| Change in Gross Margin | N/A | Focus |
KFA Mount Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to KFA Mount is to make sure KFA is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if KFA Mount's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if KFA Mount's financial numbers are properly reported.
About KFA Mount Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled
Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
About KFA Mount Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze KFA Mount Lucas's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of KFA Mount using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of KFA Mount Lucas based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this etf, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectWhen determining whether KFA Mount Lucas is a strong investment it is important to analyze KFA Mount's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact KFA Mount's
future performance.
For an informed investment choice regarding KFA Etf, refer to the following important reports: The market value of KFA Mount Lucas is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of KFA that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of KFA Mount's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is KFA Mount's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because KFA Mount's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect KFA Mount's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between KFA Mount's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if KFA Mount is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, KFA Mount's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.