| KO Stock | | | USD 63.37 0.38 0.60% |
This module uses fundamental data of Coca Cola to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Coca Cola M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out
Coca Cola Piotroski F Score and
Coca Cola Altman Z Score analysis.
At this time, Coca Cola's
Interest Debt Per Share is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 21st of November 2024,
Long Term Debt To Capitalization is likely to grow to 0.61, while
Long Term Debt is likely to drop about 18.1
B. At this time, Coca Cola's
PB Ratio is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 21st of November 2024,
Free Cash Flow Per Share is likely to grow to 2.37, while
Price To Sales Ratio is likely to drop 3.86.
At this time, it appears that Coca Cola is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Coca Cola's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Coca Cola executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Coca Cola's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-2.55
Beneish M Score - Unlikely Manipulator
| Elasticity of Receivables | |
| Financial Leverage Condition | |
Coca Cola Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Coca Cola's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Coca Cola Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical
financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Coca Cola's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Coca Cola in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Coca Cola's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Coca Cola Beneish M Score
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled
The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed
financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Coca Cola Earnings Manipulation Drivers
Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Coca Cola. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
Coca Cola ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Coca Cola's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Coca Cola's managers, analysts, and investors.
About Coca Cola Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze The Coca Cola's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Coca Cola using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of The Coca Cola based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Coca Cola
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Coca Cola position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Coca Cola will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Coca Cola could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Coca Cola when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Coca Cola - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling The Coca Cola to buy it.
The correlation of Coca Cola is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Coca Cola moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Coca Cola moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Coca Cola can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Is Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost
the valuation of Coca Cola. If investors know Coca will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Coca Cola listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth | Dividend Share | Earnings Share | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth |
The market value of Coca Cola is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Coca that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Coca Cola's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Coca Cola's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Coca Cola's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Coca Cola's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Coca Cola's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine
if Coca Cola is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Coca Cola's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.