Meta Platforms Stock EBITDA
META Stock | USD 563.09 2.43 0.43% |
Meta Platforms fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Meta Platforms' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Meta Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Meta Platforms' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Meta Platforms stock.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
EBITDA | 57.1 B | 60 B |
Meta | EBITDA |
Meta Platforms Company EBITDA Analysis
Meta Platforms' EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Meta Platforms EBITDA | 57.13 B |
Most of Meta Platforms' fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Meta Platforms is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Meta EBITDA Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Meta Platforms is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Meta Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as EBITDA. Since Meta Platforms' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Meta Platforms' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Meta Platforms' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Competition |
Meta Ebitda
Ebitda |
|
According to the company disclosure, Meta Platforms reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 57.13 B. This is much higher than that of the Interactive Media & Services sector and significantly higher than that of the Communication Services industry. The ebitda for all United States stocks is significantly lower than that of the firm.
Meta EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Meta Platforms' direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Meta Platforms could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Meta Platforms by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Meta Platforms is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Meta Platforms Current Valuation Drivers
We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Meta Platforms from analyzing Meta Platforms' financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Meta Platforms' ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Meta Platforms' important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Market Cap | 521.2B | 378.9B | 778.8B | 946.8B | 852.1B | 894.7B | |
Enterprise Value | 513.2B | 369.3B | 771.9B | 944.1B | 849.7B | 892.2B |
Meta Platforms ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Meta Platforms' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Meta Platforms' managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Meta Platforms Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Meta Platforms that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Meta Platforms' outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Meta Platforms' value.Shares | Capital Research & Mgmt Co - Division 3 | 2024-09-30 | 29.2 M | Northern Trust Corp | 2024-09-30 | 20.7 M | Legal & General Group Plc | 2024-06-30 | 18 M | Bank Of America Corp | 2024-06-30 | 17 M | Amvescap Plc. | 2024-06-30 | 16.5 M | Nuveen Asset Management, Llc | 2024-06-30 | 15.9 M | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2024-06-30 | 15.1 M | Jennison Associates Llc | 2024-09-30 | 14.4 M | Alliancebernstein L.p. | 2024-06-30 | 14 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2024-09-30 | 189.7 M | Blackrock Inc | 2024-06-30 | 161.1 M |
Meta Fundamentals
Return On Equity | 0.36 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.17 | ||||
Profit Margin | 0.36 % | ||||
Operating Margin | 0.43 % | ||||
Current Valuation | 1.41 T | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 2.18 B | ||||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.16 % | ||||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 79.31 % | ||||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 30.5 M | ||||
Price To Earning | 9.30 X | ||||
Price To Book | 8.68 X | ||||
Price To Sales | 9.14 X | ||||
Revenue | 134.9 B | ||||
Gross Profit | 92.86 B | ||||
EBITDA | 57.13 B | ||||
Net Income | 39.1 B | ||||
Cash And Equivalents | 40.49 B | ||||
Cash Per Share | 15.06 X | ||||
Total Debt | 37.23 B | ||||
Debt To Equity | 0.13 % | ||||
Current Ratio | 2.52 X | ||||
Book Value Per Share | 65.19 X | ||||
Cash Flow From Operations | 71.11 B | ||||
Short Ratio | 2.63 X | ||||
Earnings Per Share | 21.21 X | ||||
Price To Earnings To Growth | 0.91 X | ||||
Target Price | 648.35 | ||||
Number Of Employees | 72.4 K | ||||
Beta | 1.22 | ||||
Market Capitalization | 1.43 T | ||||
Total Asset | 229.62 B | ||||
Retained Earnings | 82.07 B | ||||
Working Capital | 53.41 B | ||||
Annual Yield | 0 % | ||||
Net Asset | 229.62 B | ||||
Last Dividend Paid | 1.5 |
About Meta Platforms Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Meta Platforms's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Meta Platforms using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Meta Platforms based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.When determining whether Meta Platforms offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Meta Platforms' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Meta Platforms Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Meta Platforms Stock:Check out Meta Platforms Piotroski F Score and Meta Platforms Altman Z Score analysis. For information on how to trade Meta Stock refer to our How to Trade Meta Stock guide.You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.
Is Interactive Media & Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Meta Platforms. If investors know Meta will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Meta Platforms listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.374 | Dividend Share 1.5 | Earnings Share 21.21 | Revenue Per Share 61.428 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.189 |
The market value of Meta Platforms is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Meta that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Meta Platforms' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Meta Platforms' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Meta Platforms' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Meta Platforms' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Meta Platforms' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Meta Platforms is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Meta Platforms' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.