Microsoft Net Income
| MSFT Stock | USD 393.67 20.52 4.95% |
As of the 5th of February, Microsoft secures the Mean Deviation of 1.23, standard deviation of 1.79, and Risk Adjusted Performance of (0.13). In connection with fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model lets you check existing technical drivers of Microsoft, as well as the relationship between them.
Microsoft Total Revenue |
|
Gross Profit | Profit Margin | Market Capitalization | Enterprise Value Revenue 9.8923 | Revenue |
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Income | 117.1 B | 123 B | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 117.1 B | 123 B | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 117.1 B | 123 B | |
| Net Income Per Share | 12.33 | 12.95 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.74 | 0.58 |
Microsoft | Net Income | Build AI portfolio with Microsoft Stock |
The evolution of Net Income for Microsoft provides essential context for understanding the company's financial health trajectory. By analyzing this metric's behavior over time, investors can assess whether recent trends align with long-term patterns, and how Microsoft compares to historical norms and industry peers.
Latest Microsoft's Net Income Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Income of Microsoft over the last few years. Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Microsoft financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Microsoft operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue. It is Microsoft's Net Income historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Microsoft's overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| View | Last Reported 101.83 B | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Income |
| Timeline |
Microsoft Net Income Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | 50,333,778,824 | |
| Geometric Mean | 27,216,393,179 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | 77.64 | |
| Mean Deviation | 33,420,057,439 | |
| Median | 39,240,000,000 | |
| Standard Deviation | 39,076,885,296 | |
| Sample Variance | 1527002964.4T | |
| Range | 122.9B | |
| R-Value | 0.95 | |
| Mean Square Error | 167072802.8T | |
| R-Squared | 0.90 | |
| Slope | 7,330,763,039 | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 24432047431T |
Microsoft Net Income History
Other Fundumenentals of Microsoft
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | ||
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | ||
| Net Income Per Share | ||
| Net Income Per E B T |
Microsoft Net Income component correlations
Microsoft Net Income Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Microsoft is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Microsoft Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Net Income. Since Microsoft's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Microsoft's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Microsoft's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Is there potential for Systems Software market expansion? Will Microsoft introduce new products? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Microsoft. Expected growth trajectory for Microsoft significantly influences the price investors are willing to assign. Understanding fair value requires weighing current performance against future potential. All the valuation information about Microsoft listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.598 | Dividend Share 3.48 | Earnings Share 16 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.167 |
Investors evaluate Microsoft using market value (trading price) and book value (balance sheet equity), each telling a different story. Calculating Microsoft's intrinsic value - the estimated true worth - helps identify when the stock trades at a discount or premium to fair value. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. External factors like market trends, sector rotation, and investor psychology can cause Microsoft's market price to deviate significantly from intrinsic value.
Understanding that Microsoft's value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether Microsoft represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. Conversely, Microsoft's market price signifies the transaction level at which participants voluntarily complete trades.
Microsoft 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Microsoft's stock what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Microsoft.
| 11/07/2025 |
| 02/05/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Microsoft on November 7, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Microsoft or generate 0.0% return on investment in Microsoft over 90 days. Microsoft is related to or competes with Apple, Alphabet, NVIDIA, Oracle, SPS Commerce, Fortinet, and DigitalOcean Holdings. Microsoft Corporation develops, licenses, and supports software, services, devices, and solutions worldwide More
Microsoft Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Microsoft's stock current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Microsoft upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Information Ratio | (0.23) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 13.28 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.70) | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.78 |
Microsoft Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Microsoft's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Microsoft's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Microsoft historical prices to predict the future Microsoft's volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.13) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.36) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.48) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (1.95) |
Microsoft February 5, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.13) | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | (1.94) | |||
| Mean Deviation | 1.23 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | (523.79) | |||
| Standard Deviation | 1.79 | |||
| Variance | 3.2 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.23) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.36) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.48) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (1.95) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 13.28 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.70) | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.78 | |||
| Skewness | (2.37) | |||
| Kurtosis | 12.02 |
Microsoft Backtested Returns
Microsoft has Sharpe Ratio of -0.19, which conveys that the firm had a -0.19 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. Microsoft exposes twenty-three different technical indicators, which can help you to evaluate volatility embedded in its price movement. Please verify Microsoft's Standard Deviation of 1.79, mean deviation of 1.23, and Risk Adjusted Performance of (0.13) to check out the risk estimate we provide. The company secures a Beta (Market Risk) of 0.18, which conveys not very significant fluctuations relative to the market. As returns on the market increase, Microsoft's returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during the bear market, the loss of holding Microsoft is expected to be smaller as well. At this point, Microsoft has a negative expected return of -0.36%. Please make sure to verify Microsoft's treynor ratio, as well as the relationship between the kurtosis and day typical price , to decide if Microsoft performance from the past will be repeated at some point in the near future.
Auto-correlation | 0.41 |
Average predictability
Microsoft has average predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Microsoft time series from 7th of November 2025 to 22nd of December 2025 and 22nd of December 2025 to 5th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Microsoft price movement. The serial correlation of 0.41 indicates that just about 41.0% of current Microsoft price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.41 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.55 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 652.64 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Microsoft Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Based on the recorded statements, Microsoft reported net income of 101.83 B. This is much higher than that of the Software sector and significantly higher than that of the Information Technology industry. The net income for all United States stocks is significantly lower than that of the firm.
Microsoft Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Microsoft's direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Microsoft could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Microsoft by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Microsoft is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Microsoft ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Microsoft's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Microsoft's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Microsoft Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Microsoft that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may hold large blocks of Microsoft's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Microsoft's value.| Shares | Capital Research & Mgmt Co - Division 3 | 2025-06-30 | 79.5 M | Capital Research Global Investors | 2025-06-30 | 71.8 M | Bank Of America Corp | 2025-06-30 | 70.2 M | Capital World Investors | 2025-06-30 | 66.4 M | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2025-06-30 | 56.2 M | Wellington Management Company Llp | 2025-06-30 | 53.3 M | Nuveen, Llc | 2025-06-30 | 50.9 M | Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc | 2025-06-30 | 50.8 M | Legal & General Group Plc | 2025-06-30 | 50 M | Barclays Plc | 2025-06-30 | 821.1 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2025-06-30 | 705.1 M |
Microsoft Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.34 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.15 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.39 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.47 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 3.11 T | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 7.43 B | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.06 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 76.06 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 54.65 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 26.64 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 7.81 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 10.00 X | ||||
| Revenue | 281.72 B | ||||
| Gross Profit | 209.5 B | ||||
| EBITDA | 160.16 B | ||||
| Net Income | 101.83 B | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 30.24 B | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 14.39 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 60.59 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 0.44 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.84 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 52.62 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 136.16 B | ||||
| Short Ratio | 2.43 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 16.00 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 1.57 X | ||||
| Target Price | 603.22 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 228 K | ||||
| Beta | 1.08 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 3.05 T | ||||
| Total Asset | 619 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 237.73 B | ||||
| Working Capital | 49.91 B | ||||
| Current Asset | 139.66 B | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 59.36 B | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.01 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 1.18 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 619 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 3.48 |
About Microsoft Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Microsoft's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Microsoft using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Microsoft based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Thematic Opportunities
Explore Investment Opportunities
Additional Tools for Microsoft Stock Analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.