Nutrition Management Services Stock EBITDA
| NMSCA Stock | USD 0.0001 0.00 0.00% |
Nutrition Management Services fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Nutrition Management's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Nutrition Pink Sheet. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Nutrition Management's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Nutrition Management pink sheet.
Nutrition |
Nutrition Management Services Company EBITDA Analysis
Nutrition Management's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Nutrition Management EBITDA | 619.14 K |
Most of Nutrition Management's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Nutrition Management Services is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
| Competition |
According to the company disclosure, Nutrition Management Services reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 619.14 K. This is 99.93% lower than that of the Commercial Services & Supplies sector and significantly higher than that of the Industrials industry. The ebitda for all United States stocks is 99.98% higher than that of the company.
Nutrition EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Nutrition Management's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the pink sheets which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Nutrition Management could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Nutrition Management by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Nutrition Management is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Nutrition Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.0397 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0282 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.01 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.03 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 589.4 K | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 2.85 M | |||
| Price To Earning | 0.43 X | |||
| Price To Book | 0.21 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 0.03 X | |||
| Revenue | 20.01 M | |||
| Gross Profit | 4.3 M | |||
| EBITDA | 619.14 K | |||
| Net Income | 85.37 K | |||
| Debt To Equity | 1.63 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.35 X | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 1.21 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (428.32 K) | |||
| Number Of Employees | 289 | |||
| Beta | -9.29 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 589.4 K | |||
| Total Asset | 12.25 M | |||
| Retained Earnings | 146 K | |||
| Working Capital | 2.57 M | |||
| Current Asset | 9.98 M | |||
| Current Liabilities | 7.41 M | |||
| Z Score | 1.0 | |||
| Net Asset | 12.25 M |
About Nutrition Management Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Nutrition Management Services's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Nutrition Management using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Nutrition Management Services based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Other Information on Investing in Nutrition Pink Sheet
Nutrition Management financial ratios help investors to determine whether Nutrition Pink Sheet is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Nutrition with respect to the benefits of owning Nutrition Management security.