Public Service Enterprise Stock Piotroski F Score

PEG Stock  USD 92.25  0.10  0.11%   
This module uses fundamental data of Public Service to approximate its Piotroski F score. Public Service F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Public Service Enterprise. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Public Service financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Public Service Altman Z Score, Public Service Correlation, Public Service Valuation, as well as analyze Public Service Alpha and Beta and Public Service Hype Analysis.
  
At this time, Public Service's Debt To Assets are most likely to increase slightly in the upcoming years. The Public Service's current Long Term Debt To Capitalization is estimated to increase to 0.57, while Net Debt is projected to decrease to roughly 12.1 B. At this time, Public Service's Book Value Per Share is most likely to increase in the upcoming years. The Public Service's current Free Cash Flow Yield is estimated to increase to 0.02, while Days Sales Outstanding is projected to decrease to 48.90.
At this time, it appears that Public Service's Piotroski F Score is Strong. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
7.0
Piotroski F Score - Strong
Current Return On Assets

Positive

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Decreased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Positive

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Improving

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Increase

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Lower Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Increase

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

Increase

Focus

Public Service Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Public Service is to make sure Public is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Public Service's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Public Service's financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Asset Turnover0.350.2215
Way Up
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.530.4296
Fairly Up
Slightly volatile
Net Debt12.1 B20.4 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities4.1 B5.1 B
Significantly Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total20.1 B30.2 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Assets34.9 B50.7 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets3.7 B3.4 B
Significantly Up
Slightly volatile
Total Cash From Operating Activities2.4 B3.8 B
Way Down
Very volatile

Public Service Enterprise F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Public Service's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Public Service in a much-optimized way.

About Public Service Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Common Stock Shares Outstanding

517.73 Million

At this time, Public Service's Common Stock Shares Outstanding is most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years.

Public Service ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Public Service's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Public Service's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Public Service Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Public Service Enterprise's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Public Service using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Public Service Enterprise based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether Public Service Enterprise is a strong investment it is important to analyze Public Service's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Public Service's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Public Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Is Multi-Utilities space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Public Service. If investors know Public will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Public Service listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
2.852
Dividend Share
2.37
Earnings Share
4.07
Revenue Per Share
20.912
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.076
The market value of Public Service Enterprise is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Public that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Public Service's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Public Service's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Public Service's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Public Service's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Public Service's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Public Service is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Public Service's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.