Procter Gamble Drc Stock EBITDA
PG Stock | ARS 13,175 125.00 0.96% |
Procter Gamble DRC fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Procter Gamble's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Procter Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Procter Gamble's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Procter Gamble stock.
Procter |
Procter Gamble DRC Company EBITDA Analysis
Procter Gamble's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Procter Gamble EBITDA | 21.24 B |
Most of Procter Gamble's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Procter Gamble DRC is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Competition |
According to the company disclosure, Procter Gamble DRC reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 21.24 B. This is much higher than that of the Consumer Defensive sector and significantly higher than that of the Household & Personal Products industry. The ebitda for all Argentina stocks is significantly lower than that of the firm.
Procter EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Procter Gamble's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Procter Gamble could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Procter Gamble by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Procter Gamble is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Procter Fundamentals
Return On Equity | 0.32 | |||
Return On Asset | 0.0955 | |||
Profit Margin | 0.18 % | |||
Operating Margin | 0.23 % | |||
Current Valuation | 66.88 T | |||
Shares Outstanding | 471.83 M | |||
Price To Earning | 10.71 X | |||
Price To Book | 0.65 X | |||
Price To Sales | 764.02 X | |||
Revenue | 80.19 B | |||
Gross Profit | 38.21 B | |||
EBITDA | 21.24 B | |||
Net Income | 14.74 B | |||
Cash And Equivalents | 10.29 B | |||
Cash Per Share | 0.30 X | |||
Total Debt | 22.85 B | |||
Debt To Equity | 0.70 % | |||
Current Ratio | 0.70 X | |||
Book Value Per Share | 1.31 X | |||
Cash Flow From Operations | 16.72 B | |||
Earnings Per Share | 5,421 X | |||
Price To Earnings To Growth | 0.38 X | |||
Number Of Employees | 106 K | |||
Beta | 0.4 | |||
Market Capitalization | 62.64 T | |||
Total Asset | 117.21 B | |||
Annual Yield | 0.01 % | |||
Five Year Return | 2.10 % | |||
Net Asset | 117.21 B | |||
Last Dividend Paid | 3.61 |
About Procter Gamble Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Procter Gamble DRC's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Procter Gamble using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Procter Gamble DRC based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Other Information on Investing in Procter Stock
Procter Gamble financial ratios help investors to determine whether Procter Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Procter with respect to the benefits of owning Procter Gamble security.