Principal Lifetime 2065 Fund Equity Positions Weight
| PLJAX Fund | USD 14.84 0.06 0.41% |
Principal Lifetime 2065 fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Principal Lifetime's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Principal Mutual Fund. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Principal Lifetime's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Principal Lifetime mutual fund.
Principal |
Principal Lifetime 2065 Mutual Fund Equity Positions Weight Analysis
Principal Lifetime's Percentage of fund asset invested in equity instruments. About 80% of global funds and ETFs carry equity instruments on their balance sheet.
More About Equity Positions Weight | All Equity Analysis
Stock Percentage | = | % of Equities | in the fund |
Current Principal Lifetime Equity Positions Weight | 92.94 % |
Most of Principal Lifetime's fundamental indicators, such as Equity Positions Weight, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Principal Lifetime 2065 is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Funds with most asset allocated to stocks can be subclassified into many different categories such as market capitalization or investment style.
| Competition |
According to the company disclosure, Principal Lifetime 2065 has an Equity Positions Weight of 92%. This is 4.9% lower than that of the Principal Funds family and significantly higher than that of the Target-Date 2065+ category. The equity positions weight for all United States funds is notably lower than that of the firm.
Principal Equity Positions Weight Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Principal Lifetime's direct or indirect competition against its Equity Positions Weight to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the mutual funds which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Principal Lifetime could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Principal Lifetime by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Principal Lifetime is currently under evaluation in equity positions weight among similar funds.
Fund Asset Allocation for Principal Lifetime
The fund consists of 92.94% investments in stocks, with the rest of investments allocated between bonds, cashand various exotic instruments.Asset allocation divides Principal Lifetime's investment portfolio among different asset categories to balance risk and reward by investing in a diversified mix of instruments that align with the investor's goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Mutual funds, which pool money from multiple investors to buy a diversified portfolio of securities, use asset allocation strategies to manage the risk and return of their portfolios.
Mutual funds allocate their assets by investing in a diversified portfolio of securities, such as stocks, bonds, cryptocurrencies and cash. The specific mix of these securities is determined by the fund's investment objective and strategy. For example, a stock mutual fund may invest primarily in equities, while a bond mutual fund may invest mainly in fixed-income securities. The fund's manager, responsible for making investment decisions, will buy and sell securities in the fund's portfolio as market conditions and the fund's objectives change.
Principal Fundamentals
| Total Asset | 95.38 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.01 % | ||||
| Year To Date Return | 15.58 % | ||||
| One Year Return | 22.54 % | ||||
| Three Year Return | 3.75 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 9.34 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 7.8 M | ||||
| Cash Position Weight | 2.50 % | ||||
| Equity Positions Weight | 92.94 % | ||||
| Bond Positions Weight | 0.23 % |
About Principal Lifetime Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Principal Lifetime 2065's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Principal Lifetime using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Principal Lifetime 2065 based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this mutual fund, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Other Information on Investing in Principal Mutual Fund
Principal Lifetime financial ratios help investors to determine whether Principal Mutual Fund is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Principal with respect to the benefits of owning Principal Lifetime security.
| Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk |