Radcom Stock Z Score

RDCM Stock  USD 11.62  0.16  1.36%   
Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out Radcom Piotroski F Score and Radcom Valuation analysis.
To learn how to invest in Radcom Stock, please use our How to Invest in Radcom guide.
  
At this time, Radcom's Capital Lease Obligations is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of November 2024, Capital Expenditures is likely to grow to about 448.3 K, while Net Invested Capital is likely to drop about 59.2 M. At this time, Radcom's Total Other Income Expense Net is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of November 2024, Net Income From Continuing Ops is likely to grow to about 1.1 M, while Gross Profit is likely to drop about 19.3 M.

Radcom Company Z Score Analysis

Radcom's Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..

Z Score

 = 

Sum Of

5 Factors

More About Z Score | All Equity Analysis

First Factor

 = 

1.2 * (

Working Capital

/

Total Assets )

Second Factor

 = 

1.4 * (

Retained Earnings

/

Total Assets )

Thrid Factor

 = 

3.3 * (

EBITAD

/

Total Assets )

Fouth Factor

 = 

0.6 * (

Market Value of Equity

/

Total Liabilities )

Fifth Factor

 = 

0.99 * (

Revenue

/

Total Assets )

Radcom Z Score Driver Correlations

Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Radcom is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Radcom Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Z Score. Since Radcom's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Radcom's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Radcom's interrelated accounts and indicators.
0.99-0.25-0.490.30.620.870.721.00.40.9-0.130.670.4-0.220.95-0.460.610.460.97-0.63-0.690.58-0.46
0.99-0.33-0.430.240.680.820.651.00.370.88-0.080.660.34-0.180.96-0.430.560.390.96-0.57-0.630.53-0.43
-0.25-0.33-0.050.09-0.520.250.2-0.290.16-0.27-0.380.10.090.07-0.36-0.080.340.19-0.27-0.24-0.260.14-0.08
-0.49-0.43-0.05-0.6-0.17-0.54-0.63-0.48-0.17-0.79-0.02-0.06-0.440.89-0.520.34-0.45-0.4-0.550.510.55-0.450.34
0.30.240.09-0.6-0.030.370.570.290.150.44-0.280.130.39-0.540.31-0.160.270.340.35-0.32-0.360.39-0.16
0.620.68-0.52-0.17-0.030.30.250.65-0.040.560.260.270.07-0.220.740.00.09-0.040.670.01-0.020.10.0
0.870.820.25-0.540.370.30.830.850.50.77-0.340.70.48-0.180.76-0.530.770.590.82-0.78-0.850.68-0.53
0.720.650.2-0.630.570.250.830.70.180.71-0.240.650.69-0.340.74-0.120.770.430.79-0.45-0.570.58-0.12
1.01.0-0.29-0.480.290.650.850.70.40.9-0.130.650.4-0.210.96-0.460.570.450.97-0.61-0.670.57-0.46
0.40.370.16-0.170.15-0.040.50.180.40.29-0.580.14-0.080.050.2-0.910.180.830.3-0.84-0.80.83-0.91
0.90.88-0.27-0.790.440.560.770.710.90.290.070.440.42-0.590.91-0.440.550.430.91-0.6-0.650.55-0.44
-0.13-0.08-0.38-0.02-0.280.26-0.34-0.24-0.13-0.580.07-0.05-0.24-0.270.040.39-0.05-0.56-0.060.480.48-0.510.39
0.670.660.1-0.060.130.270.70.650.650.140.44-0.050.170.20.64-0.070.830.110.67-0.3-0.390.29-0.07
0.40.340.09-0.440.390.070.480.690.4-0.080.42-0.240.17-0.210.390.060.290.370.39-0.18-0.260.230.06
-0.22-0.180.070.89-0.54-0.22-0.18-0.34-0.210.05-0.59-0.270.2-0.21-0.330.13-0.18-0.11-0.320.180.2-0.160.13
0.950.96-0.36-0.520.310.740.760.740.960.20.910.040.640.39-0.33-0.240.580.280.99-0.42-0.50.48-0.24
-0.46-0.43-0.080.34-0.160.0-0.53-0.12-0.46-0.91-0.440.39-0.070.060.13-0.24-0.16-0.79-0.320.910.85-0.721.0
0.610.560.34-0.450.270.090.770.770.570.180.55-0.050.830.29-0.180.58-0.160.190.64-0.47-0.570.37-0.16
0.460.390.19-0.40.34-0.040.590.430.450.830.43-0.560.110.37-0.110.28-0.790.190.36-0.78-0.780.88-0.79
0.970.96-0.27-0.550.350.670.820.790.970.30.91-0.060.670.39-0.320.99-0.320.640.36-0.52-0.60.58-0.32
-0.63-0.57-0.240.51-0.320.01-0.78-0.45-0.61-0.84-0.60.48-0.3-0.180.18-0.420.91-0.47-0.78-0.520.99-0.80.91
-0.69-0.63-0.260.55-0.36-0.02-0.85-0.57-0.67-0.8-0.650.48-0.39-0.260.2-0.50.85-0.57-0.78-0.60.99-0.820.85
0.580.530.14-0.450.390.10.680.580.570.830.55-0.510.290.23-0.160.48-0.720.370.880.58-0.8-0.82-0.72
-0.46-0.43-0.080.34-0.160.0-0.53-0.12-0.46-0.91-0.440.39-0.070.060.13-0.241.0-0.16-0.79-0.320.910.85-0.72
Click cells to compare fundamentals
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Competition

Based on the company's disclosures, Radcom has a Z Score of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Communications Equipment sector and 100.0% lower than that of the Information Technology industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.

Radcom Current Valuation Drivers

We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Radcom from analyzing Radcom's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Radcom's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Radcom's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
201920202021202220232024 (projected)
Market Cap117.4M152.5M184.3M158.9M121.7M127.8M
Enterprise Value117.4M142.0M174.3M151.9M112.4M118.0M

Radcom ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Radcom's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Radcom's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

Radcom Institutional Holders

Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Radcom that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Radcom's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Radcom's value.
Shares
Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc2024-09-30
48.9 K
Blackrock Inc2024-06-30
31.9 K
Diametric Capital, Lp2024-09-30
20 K
Citadel Advisors Llc2024-09-30
19.4 K
Millennium Management Llc2024-06-30
14.1 K
Geode Capital Management, Llc2024-09-30
13.7 K
Advisor Group Holdings, Inc.2024-06-30
2.7 K
Federation Des Caisses Desjardins Du Quebec2024-06-30
1.8 K
Ubs Group Ag2024-06-30
1.1 K
Lynrock Lake Lp2024-09-30
2.3 M
Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd2024-06-30
1.2 M

Radcom Fundamentals

About Radcom Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Radcom's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Radcom using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Radcom based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect
When determining whether Radcom is a strong investment it is important to analyze Radcom's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Radcom's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Radcom Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Radcom Piotroski F Score and Radcom Valuation analysis.
To learn how to invest in Radcom Stock, please use our How to Invest in Radcom guide.
You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.
Is Communications Equipment space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Radcom. If investors know Radcom will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Radcom listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
1.187
Earnings Share
0.46
Revenue Per Share
3.652
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.196
Return On Assets
0.0043
The market value of Radcom is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Radcom that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Radcom's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Radcom's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Radcom's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Radcom's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Radcom's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Radcom is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Radcom's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.