Cohen Steers Total Fund Key Technical Indicators

RFI Fund  USD 11.68  0.06  0.52%   
Cohen Steers is a fund focused on Real Estate, and investors usually evaluate it through NAV behavior, yield profile, volatility, and portfolio exposure rather than operating-company ratios. Reported annual yield is 0.47%, while the one-year return is 10.87%. As of now, RSI for Cohen Steers stands at 55, indicating neutral momentum. Momentum at the midline is a blank slate - upcoming volume and price action will likely determine the next leg.
Momentum
OversoldOverbought
55 · Neutral
Market data as of the 9th of May shows Cohen Steers priced at 11.68 per share. Measured indicators report Downside Deviation of 1.04, risk adjusted performance of 0.1079, and Mean Deviation of 0.7329. The model examines historical data series to identify measurable trend characteristics. Technical levels are measured against peer distributions.
Fund Screeners extend this analysis with cross-fund filtering and comparison. The system allows custom filter combinations across standardized fund data.

Cohen Steers' Yield generally refers to the amount of cash that is paid back to the owner of a security over a specific time (usually one year). It is expressed as a percentage of current market price, and usually amounts to all the interests and/or dividends paid over a given period. A higher yield allows the shareholders to generate returns on their investments sooner. However, it is worth noting that a high yield may be a result of market turmoil or increased price volatility.

Yield

 = 

Income from Security

Current Share Price

Current Cohen Steers Annual Yield
    
  0.0047  
For Cohen Steers, Annual Yield is most useful as one supporting data point within a fund-level valuation review. This type of analysis helps frame whether Cohen Steers' current market level looks reasonable within its fund structure. Portfolio mix, leverage, and distribution policy can influence these readings in ways that differ from operating companies. A price-to-book ratio of 1.00 helps frame the market's assessment of Cohen Steers' asset base.
Competition

Cohen Steers Total Fund Metrics Relationships

Main Technical Indicators as of May 9, 2026

Daily Market Strength Indicators

For investors tracking Cohen Steers Total, market strength indicators offer quantitative evaluation of fund behavior. When Rate of Change diverges from price direction, it often signals weakening momentum before a visible reversal in Cohen Steers.

Basic Forecasting Models

Analyzing Cohen Steers' price movement through moving averages at different time horizons reveals whether short-term momentum aligns with the longer-term trend. Touches of the upper or lower band in Cohen Steers' chart signal overbought or oversold conditions.

Cohen Steers Comparable Funds

These peer funds help position Cohen Steers within a broader category rather than against operating businesses. Useful comparisons usually include net asset value behavior, total return, volatility, distribution profile, and leverage. Peer comparison adds context for Cohen Steers without forcing a company-style competitive framework onto the fund. The resulting view is more helpful for fund analysis than a generic industry-company comparison.
 Risk & Return  Correlation

Annual Yield Peer Comparison

Comparing Cohen Steers to peer funds on Annual Yield helps show where it sits within its fund group. Comparing Cohen Steers' Annual Yield against peer funds helps show whether the reported figure is typical for the category.
Cohen Steers is currently under evaluation for annual yield relative to fund peers.

Important Fund Metrics

Financial Metrics, Fundamentals & Methodology

Cohen Steers can be evaluated by studying turnover, fees, and exposure persistence. Style drift can alter factor exposure and correlation structure across cycles.

Cohen Steers Total analytics rely on fund disclosures and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied. Statement-level metrics reflect company-reported GAAP or IFRS formats for the relevant filing period.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Gabriel Shpitalnik, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board