Construction Partners Net Income
| ROAD Stock | USD 133.93 0.84 0.62% |
As of the 14th of February 2026, Construction Partners shows the Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.0924, downside deviation of 2.39, and Mean Deviation of 1.92. In respect to fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model gives you tools to check existing technical drivers of Construction Partners, as well as the relationship between them. Please confirm Construction Partners treynor ratio, as well as the relationship between the potential upside and expected short fall to decide if Construction Partners is priced correctly, providing market reflects its regular price of 133.93 per share. Given that Construction Partners has jensen alpha of 0.2101, we suggest you to validate Construction Partners's prevailing market performance to make sure the company can sustain itself at a future point.
Construction Partners Total Revenue |
|
Gross Profit | Profit Margin | Market Capitalization | Enterprise Value Revenue 3.0557 | Revenue |
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 117 M | 122.9 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 19.2 M | 25.6 M | |
| Net Income | 117 M | 122.9 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 1.67 | 1.75 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.68 | 0.59 |
Construction | Net Income | Build AI portfolio with Construction Stock |
Analyzing Construction Partners's Net Income over time reveals critical patterns in financial health and operational efficiency. This metric helps investors evaluate trends, identify inflection points, and make informed decisions based on historical performance. Understanding how Net Income has evolved provides context for assessing Construction Partners's current valuation and future prospects.
Latest Construction Partners' Net Income Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Income of Construction Partners over the last few years. Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Construction Partners financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Construction Partners operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue. It is Construction Partners' Net Income historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Construction Partners' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| View | Last Reported 101.78 M | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Income |
| Timeline |
Construction Net Income Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | 46,679,966 | |
| Geometric Mean | 37,443,448 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | 75.32 | |
| Mean Deviation | 27,098,426 | |
| Median | 26,040,000 | |
| Standard Deviation | 35,160,073 | |
| Sample Variance | 1236.2T | |
| Range | 102.7M | |
| R-Value | 0.80 | |
| Mean Square Error | 477.6T | |
| R-Squared | 0.64 | |
| Significance | 0.0001 | |
| Slope | 5,560,794 | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 19779.7T |
Construction Net Income History
Other Fundumenentals of Construction Partners
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | ||
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | ||
| Net Income Per Share | ||
| Net Income Per E B T |
Construction Partners Net Income component correlations
Construction Net Income Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Construction Partners is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Construction Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Net Income. Since Construction Partners' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Construction Partners' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Construction Partners' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Will Construction & Engineering sector continue expanding? Could Construction diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Construction Partners. Anticipated expansion of Construction directly elevates investor willingness to pay premium valuations. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Construction Partners data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.809 | Earnings Share 2.21 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.441 | Return On Assets |
The market value of Construction Partners is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Construction that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Construction Partners' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Construction Partners' true underlying value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Because Construction Partners' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Construction Partners' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
It's important to distinguish between Construction Partners' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Construction Partners should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. Meanwhile, Construction Partners' quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.
Construction Partners 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Construction Partners' stock what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Construction Partners.
| 11/16/2025 |
| 02/14/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Construction Partners on November 16, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Construction Partners or generate 0.0% return on investment in Construction Partners over 90 days. Construction Partners is related to or competes with MYR, Granite Construction, Tutor Perini, Sterling Construction, EMCOR, Comfort Systems, and Primoris Services. Construction Partners, Inc., a civil infrastructure company, engages in the construction and maintenance of roadways acr... More
Construction Partners Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Construction Partners' stock current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Construction Partners upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 2.39 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.079 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 11.69 | |||
| Value At Risk | (4.23) | |||
| Potential Upside | 3.33 |
Construction Partners Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Construction Partners' investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Construction Partners' standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Construction Partners historical prices to predict the future Construction Partners' volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0924 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.2101 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.0722 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.0857 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.2886 |
Construction Partners February 14, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0924 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.2986 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 1.92 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 2.18 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 2.39 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 944.03 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 2.6 | |||
| Variance | 6.75 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.079 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.2101 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.0722 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.0857 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.2886 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 11.69 | |||
| Value At Risk | (4.23) | |||
| Potential Upside | 3.33 | |||
| Downside Variance | 5.73 | |||
| Semi Variance | 4.73 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (2.02) | |||
| Skewness | 0.8674 | |||
| Kurtosis | 3.75 |
Construction Partners Backtested Returns
Construction Partners appears to be very steady, given 3 months investment horizon. Construction Partners secures Sharpe Ratio (or Efficiency) of 0.17, which signifies that the company had a 0.17 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. We have found twenty-eight technical indicators for Construction Partners, which you can use to evaluate the volatility of the firm. Please makes use of Construction Partners' Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.0924, downside deviation of 2.39, and Mean Deviation of 1.92 to double-check if our risk estimates are consistent with your expectations. On a scale of 0 to 100, Construction Partners holds a performance score of 13. The firm shows a Beta (market volatility) of 0.92, which signifies possible diversification benefits within a given portfolio. Construction Partners returns are very sensitive to returns on the market. As the market goes up or down, Construction Partners is expected to follow. Please check Construction Partners' expected short fall, day median price, and the relationship between the potential upside and accumulation distribution , to make a quick decision on whether Construction Partners' price patterns will revert.
Auto-correlation | 0.56 |
Modest predictability
Construction Partners has modest predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Construction Partners time series from 16th of November 2025 to 31st of December 2025 and 31st of December 2025 to 14th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Construction Partners price movement. The serial correlation of 0.56 indicates that roughly 56.0% of current Construction Partners price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.56 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.43 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 58.83 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Construction Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Based on the recorded statements, Construction Partners reported net income of 101.78 M. This is 60.77% lower than that of the Construction & Engineering sector and 43.65% lower than that of the Industrials industry. The net income for all United States stocks is 82.17% higher than that of the company.
Construction Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Construction Partners' direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Construction Partners could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Construction Partners by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Construction Partners is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Construction Partners ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Construction Partners' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Construction Partners' managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Construction Partners Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Construction Partners that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may hold large blocks of Construction Partners' outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Construction Partners' value.| Shares | Driehaus Capital Management Llc | 2025-06-30 | 1.1 M | American Century Companies Inc | 2025-06-30 | 984.9 K | Alliancebernstein L.p. | 2025-06-30 | 982.9 K | Ameriprise Financial Inc | 2025-06-30 | 842.5 K | First Trust Advisors L.p. | 2025-06-30 | 795.5 K | Clearbridge Advisors, Llc | 2025-06-30 | 713 K | Allspring Global Investments Holdings, Llc | 2025-06-30 | 712.8 K | Artemis Investment Management Llp | 2025-06-30 | 711.6 K | Lord, Abbett & Co Llc | 2025-06-30 | 631.6 K | Vanguard Group Inc | 2025-06-30 | 4.6 M | Blackrock Inc | 2025-06-30 | 3.5 M |
Construction Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0627 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.04 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.08 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 9.35 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 47.97 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.30 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 98.70 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.43 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 33.55 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 7.86 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 2.49 X | ||||
| Revenue | 2.81 B | ||||
| Gross Profit | 484.02 M | ||||
| EBITDA | 373.17 M | ||||
| Net Income | 101.78 M | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 26.08 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 0.50 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 1.69 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 0.85 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.91 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 17.14 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 291.3 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 7.87 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 2.21 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 2.10 X | ||||
| Target Price | 133.29 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 1.64 K | ||||
| Beta | 0.87 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 7.62 B | ||||
| Total Asset | 3.24 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 416.99 M | ||||
| Working Capital | 352.78 M | ||||
| Net Asset | 3.24 B |
About Construction Partners Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Construction Partners's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Construction Partners using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Construction Partners based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.When determining whether Construction Partners is a strong investment it is important to analyze Construction Partners' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Construction Partners' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Construction Stock, refer to the following important reports:Check out For information on how to trade Construction Stock refer to our How to Trade Construction Stock guide.You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.
Will Construction & Engineering sector continue expanding? Could Construction diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Construction Partners. Anticipated expansion of Construction directly elevates investor willingness to pay premium valuations. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Construction Partners data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.809 | Earnings Share 2.21 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.441 | Return On Assets |
The market value of Construction Partners is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Construction that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Construction Partners' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Construction Partners' true underlying value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Because Construction Partners' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Construction Partners' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
It's important to distinguish between Construction Partners' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Construction Partners should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. Meanwhile, Construction Partners' quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.