Running Oak Efficient Etf Net Income
| RUNN Etf | 34.25 0.46 1.33% |
As of the 11th of February 2026, Running Oak holds the Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.0843, coefficient of variation of 956.23, and Semi Deviation of 0.6904. Compared to fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model allows you to check existing technical drivers of Running Oak, as well as the relationship between them.
Running Oak's financial statements offer valuable quarterly and annual insights to potential investors, highlighting the company's current and historical financial position, overall management performance, and changes in financial standing over time. Key fundamentals influencing Running Oak's valuation are provided below:Running Oak Efficient does not presently have any trending fundamental ratios for analysis. This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools. Understanding Running Oak Efficient requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Running's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what Running Oak's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Running Oak's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Running Oak's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Running Oak should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, Running Oak's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.
Running Oak 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Running Oak's etf what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Running Oak.
| 11/13/2025 |
| 02/11/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Running Oak on November 13, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Running Oak Efficient or generate 0.0% return on investment in Running Oak over 90 days. Running Oak is related to or competes with First Trust, Morningstar Unconstrained, High-yield Municipal, Thrivent High, T Rowe, Bondbloxx ETF, and Knife River. Running Oak is entity of United States. It is traded as Etf on NASDAQ exchange. More
Running Oak Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Running Oak's etf current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Running Oak Efficient upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 0.7665 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.01) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 4.14 | |||
| Value At Risk | (1.04) | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.81 |
Running Oak Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Running Oak's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Running Oak's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Running Oak historical prices to predict the future Running Oak's volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0843 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.0035 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.01) | |||
| Sortino Ratio | (0.01) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.0865 |
Running Oak February 11, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0843 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0965 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 0.6525 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 0.6904 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 0.7665 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 956.23 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 0.8451 | |||
| Variance | 0.7141 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.01) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.0035 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.01) | |||
| Sortino Ratio | (0.01) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.0865 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 4.14 | |||
| Value At Risk | (1.04) | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.81 | |||
| Downside Variance | 0.5875 | |||
| Semi Variance | 0.4766 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (0.70) | |||
| Skewness | 0.3581 | |||
| Kurtosis | 0.1711 |
Running Oak Efficient Backtested Returns
As of now, Running Etf is very steady. Running Oak Efficient maintains Sharpe Ratio (i.e., Efficiency) of 0.11, which implies the entity had a 0.11 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. We have found twenty-six technical indicators for Running Oak Efficient, which you can use to evaluate the volatility of the etf. Please check Running Oak's Semi Deviation of 0.6904, risk adjusted performance of 0.0843, and Coefficient Of Variation of 956.23 to confirm if the risk estimate we provide is consistent with the expected return of 0.0929%. The etf holds a Beta of 0.91, which implies possible diversification benefits within a given portfolio. Running Oak returns are very sensitive to returns on the market. As the market goes up or down, Running Oak is expected to follow.
Auto-correlation | 0.49 |
Average predictability
Running Oak Efficient has average predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Running Oak time series from 13th of November 2025 to 28th of December 2025 and 28th of December 2025 to 11th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Running Oak Efficient price movement. The serial correlation of 0.49 indicates that about 49.0% of current Running Oak price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.49 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.37 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 0.19 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Based on the recorded statements, Running Oak Efficient reported net income of 0.0. This indicator is about the same for the average (which is currently at 0.0) family and about the same as Mid-Cap Blend (which currently averages 0.0) category. This indicator is about the same for all United States etfs average (which is currently at 0.0).
Running Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Running Oak's direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the etfs which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Running Oak could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Running Oak by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Running Oak is currently under evaluation in net income as compared to similar ETFs.
About Running Oak Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Running Oak Efficient's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Running Oak using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Running Oak Efficient based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this etf, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Running Oak
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Running Oak position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Running Oak will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Running Etf
| 0.96 | VO | Vanguard Mid Cap | PairCorr |
| 0.93 | VXF | Vanguard Extended Market | PairCorr |
| 0.98 | IJH | iShares Core SP | PairCorr |
| 0.98 | IWR | iShares Russell Mid Sell-off Trend | PairCorr |
| 0.98 | MDY | SPDR SP MIDCAP | PairCorr |
Moving against Running Etf
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Running Oak could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Running Oak when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Running Oak - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Running Oak Efficient to buy it.
The correlation of Running Oak is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Running Oak moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Running Oak Efficient moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Running Oak can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.
Understanding Running Oak Efficient requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Running's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what Running Oak's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Running Oak's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Running Oak's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Running Oak should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, Running Oak's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.