Running Oak Efficient Etf Technical Analysis
| RUNN Etf | 33.82 0.28 0.83% |
As of the 15th of February 2026, Running Oak holds the Coefficient Of Variation of 2064.42, semi deviation of 0.8264, and Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.0401. Compared to fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model allows you to check existing technical drivers of Running Oak, as well as the relationship between them.
Running Oak Momentum Analysis
Momentum indicators are widely used technical indicators which help to measure the pace at which the price of specific equity, such as Running, fluctuates. Many momentum indicators also complement each other and can be helpful when the market is rising or falling as compared to RunningRunning Oak's Momentum analyses are specifically helpful, as they help investors time the market using mark points where the market can reverse. The reversal spots are usually identified through divergence between price movement and momentum.Understanding Running Oak Efficient requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Running's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what Running Oak's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Running Oak's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Running Oak's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Running Oak should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, Running Oak's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.
Running Oak 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Running Oak's etf what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Running Oak.
| 11/17/2025 |
| 02/15/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Running Oak on November 17, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Running Oak Efficient or generate 0.0% return on investment in Running Oak over 90 days. Running Oak is related to or competes with Professionally Managed, First Trust, WisdomTree Efficient, Adaptive Alpha, First Trust, AIM ETF, and Goldman Sachs. Running Oak is entity of United States. It is traded as Etf on NASDAQ exchange. More
Running Oak Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Running Oak's etf current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Running Oak Efficient upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 0.8672 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.03) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 4.14 | |||
| Value At Risk | (1.22) | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.81 |
Running Oak Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Running Oak's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Running Oak's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Running Oak historical prices to predict the future Running Oak's volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0401 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.02) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.03) | |||
| Sortino Ratio | (0.03) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.0353 |
Running Oak February 15, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0401 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0453 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 0.6933 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 0.8264 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 0.8672 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 2064.42 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 0.897 | |||
| Variance | 0.8046 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.03) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.02) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.03) | |||
| Sortino Ratio | (0.03) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.0353 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 4.14 | |||
| Value At Risk | (1.22) | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.81 | |||
| Downside Variance | 0.752 | |||
| Semi Variance | 0.6829 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (0.72) | |||
| Skewness | 0.1872 | |||
| Kurtosis | 0.1343 |
Running Oak Efficient Backtested Returns
As of now, Running Etf is very steady. Running Oak Efficient maintains Sharpe Ratio (i.e., Efficiency) of 0.0845, which implies the entity had a 0.0845 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. We have found twenty-nine technical indicators for Running Oak Efficient, which you can use to evaluate the volatility of the etf. Please check Running Oak's Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.0401, semi deviation of 0.8264, and Coefficient Of Variation of 2064.42 to confirm if the risk estimate we provide is consistent with the expected return of 0.0756%. The etf holds a Beta of 0.95, which implies possible diversification benefits within a given portfolio. Running Oak returns are very sensitive to returns on the market. As the market goes up or down, Running Oak is expected to follow.
Auto-correlation | 0.12 |
Insignificant predictability
Running Oak Efficient has insignificant predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Running Oak time series from 17th of November 2025 to 1st of January 2026 and 1st of January 2026 to 15th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Running Oak Efficient price movement. The serial correlation of 0.12 indicates that less than 12.0% of current Running Oak price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.12 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | -0.3 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 0.17 |
Running Oak technical etf analysis exercises models and trading practices based on price and volume transformations, such as the moving averages, relative strength index, regressions, price and return correlations, business cycles, etf market cycles, or different charting patterns.
Running Oak Efficient Technical Analysis
The output start index for this execution was one with a total number of output elements of sixty. The Normalized Average True Range is used to analyze tradable apportunities for Running Oak Efficient across different markets.
About Running Oak Technical Analysis
The technical analysis module can be used to analyzes prices, returns, volume, basic money flow, and other market information and help investors to determine the real value of Running Oak Efficient on a daily or weekly bases. We use both bottom-up as well as top-down valuation methodologies to arrive at the intrinsic value of Running Oak Efficient based on its technical analysis. In general, a bottom-up approach, as applied to this etf, focuses on Running Oak Efficient price pattern first instead of the macroeconomic environment surrounding Running Oak Efficient. By analyzing Running Oak's financials, daily price indicators, and related drivers such as dividends, momentum ratios, and various types of growth rates, we attempt to find the most accurate representation of Running Oak's intrinsic value. As compared to a bottom-up approach, our top-down model examines the macroeconomic factors that affect the industry/economy before zooming in to Running Oak specific price patterns or momentum indicators. Please read more on our technical analysis page.
Running Oak February 15, 2026 Technical Indicators
Most technical analysis of Running help investors determine whether a current trend will continue and, if not, when it will shift. We provide a combination of tools to recognize potential entry and exit points for Running from various momentum indicators to cycle indicators. When you analyze Running charts, please remember that the event formation may indicate an entry point for a short seller, and look at different other indicators across different periods to confirm that a breakdown or reversion is likely to occur.
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0401 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0453 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 0.6933 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 0.8264 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 0.8672 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 2064.42 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 0.897 | |||
| Variance | 0.8046 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.03) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.02) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.03) | |||
| Sortino Ratio | (0.03) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.0353 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 4.14 | |||
| Value At Risk | (1.22) | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.81 | |||
| Downside Variance | 0.752 | |||
| Semi Variance | 0.6829 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (0.72) | |||
| Skewness | 0.1872 | |||
| Kurtosis | 0.1343 |
Running Oak February 15, 2026 Daily Trend Indicators
Traders often use several different daily volumes and price technical indicators to supplement a more traditional technical analysis when analyzing securities such as Running stock. With literally thousands of different options, investors must choose the best indicators for them and familiarize themselves with how they work. We suggest combining traditional momentum indicators with more near-term forms of technical analysis such as Accumulation Distribution or Daily Balance Of Power. With their quantitative nature, daily value technical indicators can also be incorporated into your automated trading systems.
| Accumulation Distribution | 0.01 | ||
| Daily Balance Of Power | 1.08 | ||
| Rate Of Daily Change | 1.01 | ||
| Day Median Price | 33.86 | ||
| Day Typical Price | 33.85 | ||
| Price Action Indicator | 0.10 | ||
| Market Facilitation Index | 0.26 |
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Running Oak Efficient. Also, note that the market value of any etf could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.
Understanding Running Oak Efficient requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Running's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what Running Oak's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Running Oak's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Running Oak's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Running Oak should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, Running Oak's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.