Science In Sport Stock EBITDA
| SIS Stock | 26.00 0.50 1.89% |
Science in Sport fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Science In's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Science Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Science In's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Science In stock.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| EBITDA | -3.7 M | -3.5 M |
Science | EBITDA |
Science in Sport Company EBITDA Analysis
Science In's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Science In EBITDA | (3.7 M) |
Most of Science In's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Science in Sport is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
| Competition |
Science Ebitda
Ebitda |
|
According to the company disclosure, Science in Sport reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of (3.7 Million). This is 100.24% lower than that of the Food Products sector and 100.38% lower than that of the Consumer Staples industry. The ebitda for all United Kingdom stocks is 100.09% higher than that of the company.
Science EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Science In's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Science In could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Science In by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Science In is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Science Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -0.33 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0801 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.19) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.07) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 72.58 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 230.23 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 14.93 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 68.37 % | ||||
| Price To Book | 2.29 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 1.13 X | ||||
| Revenue | 62.67 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 26.94 M | ||||
| EBITDA | (3.7 M) | ||||
| Net Income | (11.28 M) | ||||
| Total Debt | 23.85 M | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 0.15 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 3.25 M | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | (0.06) X | ||||
| Target Price | 30.0 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 330 | ||||
| Beta | 0.49 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 61.01 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 70.3 M | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (41.1 M) | ||||
| Working Capital | (5.27 M) | ||||
| Net Asset | 70.3 M |
About Science In Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Science in Sport's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Science In using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Science in Sport based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Other Information on Investing in Science Stock
Science In financial ratios help investors to determine whether Science Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Science with respect to the benefits of owning Science In security.