Solid Power Net Income
| SLDP Stock | USD 3.64 0.04 1.11% |
As of the 16th of February 2026, Solid Power has the Coefficient Of Variation of (468.51), risk adjusted performance of (0.16), and Variance of 20.17. In relation to fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model makes it possible for you to check existing technical drivers of Solid Power, as well as the relationship between them.
Solid Power Total Revenue |
|
Gross Profit | Market Capitalization | Enterprise Value Revenue 27.8376 | Revenue | Earnings Share (0.54) |
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Loss | -86.9 M | -82.5 M | |
| Net Loss | -11 M | -11.5 M | |
| Net Loss | -86.9 M | -82.5 M | |
| Net Loss | (0.62) | (0.59) | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 1.16 | 1.10 |
Solid | Net Income | Build AI portfolio with Solid Stock |
Evaluating Solid Power's Net Income across multiple reporting periods reveals the company's ability to sustain growth and manage resources effectively. This longitudinal analysis highlights inflection points, cyclical patterns, and structural changes that short-term snapshots might miss, offering deeper insight into Solid Power's fundamental strength.
Latest Solid Power's Net Income Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Income of Solid Power over the last few years. Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Solid Power financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Solid Power operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue. It is Solid Power's Net Loss historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Solid Power's overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| View | Last Reported (96.52 M) | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Income |
| Timeline |
Solid Net Income Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | (25,257,878) | |
| Geometric Mean | 16,492,362 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | (134.98) | |
| Mean Deviation | 27,109,422 | |
| Median | (9,208,432) | |
| Standard Deviation | 34,092,728 | |
| Sample Variance | 1162.3T | |
| Range | 114.6M | |
| R-Value | (0.68) | |
| Mean Square Error | 671.1T | |
| R-Squared | 0.46 | |
| Significance | 0 | |
| Slope | (4,572,394) | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 18597T |
Solid Net Income History
Other Fundumenentals of Solid Power
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | ||
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | ||
| Net Income Per Share | ||
| Net Income Per E B T |
Solid Power Net Income component correlations
Solid Net Income Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Solid Power is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Solid Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Net Income. Since Solid Power's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Solid Power's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Solid Power's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Can Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components industry sustain growth momentum? Does Solid have expansion opportunities? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Solid Power. If investors know Solid will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. Determining accurate worth demands scrutiny of both present operating results and projected expansion capacity. Evaluating Solid Power demands reviewing these metrics collectively while recognizing certain factors exert disproportionate influence.
Earnings Share (0.54) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.20) | Return On Assets | Return On Equity |
Understanding Solid Power requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Solid's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what Solid Power's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Market participants employ diverse analytical approaches to determine fair value and identify buying opportunities when prices dip below calculated worth. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Solid Power's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Solid Power's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Solid Power is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. In contrast, Solid Power's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.
Solid Power 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Solid Power's stock what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Solid Power.
| 11/18/2025 |
| 02/16/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Solid Power on November 18, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Solid Power or generate 0.0% return on investment in Solid Power over 90 days. Solid Power is related to or competes with Evolv Technologies, Preformed Line, Eos Energy, Allegiant Travel, Eve Holding, PROG Holdings, and Redwire Corp. Solid Power, Inc. focuses on the development and commercialization of all-solid-state battery cells and solid electrolyt... More
Solid Power Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Solid Power's stock current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Solid Power upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Information Ratio | (0.23) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 19.34 | |||
| Value At Risk | (8.23) | |||
| Potential Upside | 5.89 |
Solid Power Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Solid Power's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Solid Power's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Solid Power historical prices to predict the future Solid Power's volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.16) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (1.09) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (1.30) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.48) |
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of Solid Power's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
Solid Power February 16, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.16) | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.47) | |||
| Mean Deviation | 3.56 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | (468.51) | |||
| Standard Deviation | 4.49 | |||
| Variance | 20.17 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.23) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (1.09) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (1.30) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.48) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 19.34 | |||
| Value At Risk | (8.23) | |||
| Potential Upside | 5.89 | |||
| Skewness | 0.0499 | |||
| Kurtosis | 0.0577 |
Solid Power Backtested Returns
Solid Power owns Efficiency Ratio (i.e., Sharpe Ratio) of -0.15, which indicates the firm had a -0.15 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. Solid Power exposes twenty-two different technical indicators, which can help you to evaluate volatility embedded in its price movement. Please validate Solid Power's Variance of 20.17, risk adjusted performance of (0.16), and Coefficient Of Variation of (468.51) to confirm the risk estimate we provide. The entity has a beta of 2.02, which indicates a somewhat significant risk relative to the market. As the market goes up, the company is expected to outperform it. However, if the market returns are negative, Solid Power will likely underperform. At this point, Solid Power has a negative expected return of -0.64%. Please make sure to validate Solid Power's jensen alpha, skewness, as well as the relationship between the Skewness and day median price , to decide if Solid Power performance from the past will be repeated at some point in the near future.
Auto-correlation | 0.77 |
Good predictability
Solid Power has good predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Solid Power time series from 18th of November 2025 to 2nd of January 2026 and 2nd of January 2026 to 16th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Solid Power price movement. The serial correlation of 0.77 indicates that around 77.0% of current Solid Power price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.77 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.62 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 0.5 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Solid Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Based on the recorded statements, Solid Power reported net income of (96.52 Million). This is 137.2% lower than that of the Machinery sector and significantly lower than that of the Industrials industry. The net income for all United States stocks is 116.9% higher than that of the company.
Solid Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Solid Power's direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Solid Power could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Solid Power by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Solid Power is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Solid Power ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Solid Power's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Solid Power's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Solid Power Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Solid Power that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may hold large blocks of Solid Power's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Solid Power's value.| Shares | Ubs Group Ag | 2025-06-30 | 756.4 K | Nuveen, Llc | 2025-06-30 | 533.1 K | Cva Family Office, Llc | 2025-06-30 | 529.1 K | D. E. Shaw & Co Lp | 2025-06-30 | 507 K | Fourworld Capital Management Llc | 2025-06-30 | 477.1 K | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2025-06-30 | 391.1 K | Susquehanna International Group, Llp | 2025-06-30 | 352.1 K | Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc. | 2025-06-30 | 332 K | Royal Bank Of Canada | 2025-06-30 | 326.8 K | Blackrock Inc | 2025-06-30 | 10.2 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2025-06-30 | 8.2 M |
Solid Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -0.24 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.14 | ||||
| Operating Margin | (6.34) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 551.24 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 218.2 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 11.14 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 47.19 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 26.01 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 27.39 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 2.08 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 40.11 X | ||||
| Revenue | 20.14 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 1.43 M | ||||
| EBITDA | (88.87 M) | ||||
| Net Income | (96.52 M) | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 484.3 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 2.78 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 9.41 M | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 0.01 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 36.06 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 2.00 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (63.9 M) | ||||
| Short Ratio | 3.93 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | (0.54) X | ||||
| Target Price | 7.0 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 260 | ||||
| Beta | 1.9 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 794.25 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 448.25 M | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (181.17 M) | ||||
| Working Capital | 105.27 M | ||||
| Net Asset | 448.25 M |
About Solid Power Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Solid Power's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Solid Power using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Solid Power based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Solid Power
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Solid Power position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Solid Power will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Solid Stock
Moving against Solid Stock
| 0.58 | JUN3 | Jungheinrich AG ONVZO | PairCorr |
| 0.57 | HI | Hillenbrand | PairCorr |
| 0.57 | IR | Ingersoll Rand | PairCorr |
| 0.54 | HZ8 | Insteel Industries | PairCorr |
| 0.53 | PH | Parker Hannifin | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Solid Power could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Solid Power when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Solid Power - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Solid Power to buy it.
The correlation of Solid Power is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Solid Power moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Solid Power moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Solid Power can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Solid Stock Analysis
When running Solid Power's price analysis, check to measure Solid Power's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Solid Power is operating at the current time. Most of Solid Power's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Solid Power's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Solid Power's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Solid Power to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.