TEPSX Fund | | | USD 31.11 0.66 2.08% |
This module uses fundamental data of Technology Ultrasector to approximate its Piotroski F score. Technology Ultrasector F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Technology Ultrasector Profund. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Technology Ultrasector financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out
World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Technology Ultrasector Profund. Also, note that the market value of any mutual fund could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as
signals in state.
At this time, it appears that Technology Ultrasector's Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized
Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of
predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
0.0
Piotroski F Score - Inapplicable
| Current Return On Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Change in Return on Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | N/A | Focus |
| Asset Turnover Growth | N/A | Focus |
| Current Ratio Change | N/A | Focus |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | N/A | Focus |
| Change In Outstending Shares | N/A | Focus |
| Change in Gross Margin | N/A | Focus |
Technology Ultrasector Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Technology Ultrasector is to make sure TECHNOLOGY is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Technology Ultrasector's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Technology Ultrasector's financial numbers are properly reported.
About Technology Ultrasector Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled
Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
About Technology Ultrasector Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Technology Ultrasector Profund's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Technology Ultrasector using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of Technology Ultrasector Profund based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this mutual fund, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
Other Information on Investing in TECHNOLOGY Mutual Fund
Technology Ultrasector financial ratios help investors to determine whether TECHNOLOGY Mutual Fund is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in TECHNOLOGY with respect to the benefits of owning Technology Ultrasector security.
| Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm |
| Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data |