The Altman Z-Score is one of the most widely-used financial formulas to predict bankruptcy risk. Developed by Edward Altman in 1968, this model combines five key financial ratios to generate a single score that indicates the likelihood of financial distress within two years.
How to Interpret TriNet Z-Score
Z-Score above 3.0: Safe zone - Low bankruptcy risk Z-Score 2.7 - 3.0: Gray zone - Moderate risk Z-Score 1.8 - 2.7: Warning zone - Elevated risk Z-Score below 1.8: Distress zone - High bankruptcy risk
Why TriNet Z-Score Matters
Investors use the Z-Score to assess financial health before making investment decisions. A declining Z-Score over time may signal deteriorating fundamentals, while an improving score suggests strengthening financial position. The model evaluates five critical metrics: working capital to assets, retained earnings to assets, EBIT to assets, market value of equity to total liabilities, and sales to assets.
TriNet Z-Score Analysis
The module uses available fundamental data of TriNet to calculate the Altman Z score based on five fundamental metrics from the company's most recent public disclosure documents. Check out
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for TriNet is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of TriNet Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Z Score. Since TriNet's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of TriNet's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of TriNet's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Is there potential for Human Resource & Employment Services market expansion? Will TriNet introduce new products? Factors like these will boost the valuation of TriNet. If investors know TriNet will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. Understanding fair value requires weighing current performance against future potential. All the valuation information about TriNet listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.21)
Dividend Share
1.075
Earnings Share
2.75
Revenue Per Share
100.934
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.02)
Investors evaluate TriNet Group using market value (trading price) and book value (balance sheet equity), each telling a different story. Calculating TriNet's intrinsic value - the estimated true worth - helps identify when the stock trades at a discount or premium to fair value. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. External factors like market trends, sector rotation, and investor psychology can cause TriNet's market price to deviate significantly from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between TriNet's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if TriNet is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Conversely, TriNet's market price signifies the transaction level at which participants voluntarily complete trades.
TriNet 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to TriNet's stock what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of TriNet.
0.00
11/07/2025
No Change 0.00
0.0
In 3 months and 1 day
02/05/2026
0.00
If you would invest 0.00 in TriNet on November 7, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding TriNet Group or generate 0.0% return on investment in TriNet over 90 days. TriNet is related to or competes with Robert Half, Unifirst, CBIZ, Huron Consulting, Korn Ferry, McGrath RentCorp, and ABM Industries. TriNet Group, Inc. provides human resources solutions, payroll services, employee benefits, and employment risk mitigati... More
TriNet Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure TriNet's stock current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess TriNet Group upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for TriNet's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as TriNet's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use TriNet historical prices to predict the future TriNet's volatility.
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of TriNet's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
Currently, TriNet Group is very steady. TriNet Group owns Efficiency Ratio (i.e., Sharpe Ratio) of 0.0141, which indicates the firm had a 0.0141 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. We have found twenty-two technical indicators for TriNet Group, which you can use to evaluate the volatility of the company. Please validate TriNet's Risk Adjusted Performance of (0.02), coefficient of variation of (2,829), and Variance of 5.55 to confirm if the risk estimate we provide is consistent with the expected return of 0.0327%. TriNet has a performance score of 1 on a scale of 0 to 100. The entity has a beta of 1.37, which indicates a somewhat significant risk relative to the market. As the market goes up, the company is expected to outperform it. However, if the market returns are negative, TriNet will likely underperform. TriNet Group right now has a risk of 2.32%. Please validate TriNet information ratio, potential upside, as well as the relationship between the Potential Upside and rate of daily change , to decide if TriNet will be following its existing price patterns.
Auto-correlation
0.13
Insignificant predictability
TriNet Group has insignificant predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between TriNet time series from 7th of November 2025 to 22nd of December 2025 and 22nd of December 2025 to 5th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of TriNet Group price movement. The serial correlation of 0.13 indicates that less than 13.0% of current TriNet price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
Correlation Coefficient
0.13
Spearman Rank Test
-0.04
Residual Average
0.0
Price Variance
5.05
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Based on the company's disclosures, TriNet Group has a Z Score of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Professional Services sector and about the same as Industrials (which currently averages 0.0) industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.
TriNet ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, TriNet's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to TriNet's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
TriNet Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in TriNet that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may hold large blocks of TriNet's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing TriNet's value.
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze TriNet Group's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of TriNet using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of TriNet Group based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
When running TriNet's price analysis, check to measure TriNet's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy TriNet is operating at the current time. Most of TriNet's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of TriNet's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move TriNet's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of TriNet to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.