Under Armour C Stock Beneish M Score

UA Stock  USD 8.43  0.11  1.32%   
This module uses fundamental data of Under Armour to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Under Armour M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Under Armour Piotroski F Score and Under Armour Altman Z Score analysis.
  
At present, Under Armour's Net Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Short and Long Term Debt Total is expected to grow to about 1.5 B, whereas Long Term Debt is forecasted to decline to about 560.6 M. At present, Under Armour's Price To Sales Ratio is projected to slightly decrease based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's PTB Ratio is expected to grow to 4.61, whereas Dividend Yield is forecasted to decline to 0.0003.
At this time, it appears that Under Armour C is a possible manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Under Armour's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Under Armour executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Under Armour's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-1.19
Beneish M Score - Possible Manipulator
Elasticity of Receivables

1.77

Focus
Asset Quality

3.23

Focus
Expense Coverage

1.11

Focus
Gross Margin Strengs

1.08

Focus
Accruals Factor

1.11

Focus
Depreciation Resistance

1.08

Focus
Net Sales Growth

0.59

Focus
Financial Leverage Condition

0.79

Focus

Under Armour Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends

The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Under Armour's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Net Receivables795.2 M757.3 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Revenue3.4 B5.7 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total AssetsB4.8 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets1.4 B2.9 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Assets TotalB1.9 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Depreciation And Amortization137.6 M142.6 M
Sufficiently Down
Slightly volatile
Selling General Administrative1.6 B2.4 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities648.2 M1.2 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total1.5 B1.4 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Short Term Debt141 M80.9 M
Way Up
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.50.4613
Significantly Up
Very volatile

Under Armour C Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Under Armour's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Under Armour in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Under Armour's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.

About Under Armour Beneish M Score

M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.

Current Deferred Revenue

427.18 Million

At present, Under Armour's Current Deferred Revenue is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.

Under Armour Earnings Manipulation Drivers

Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Under Armour. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
201920202021202220232024 (projected)
Net Receivables708.7M527.3M569.0M759.9M757.3M795.2M
Total Assets4.8B5.0B5.0B4.9B4.8B5.0B
Total Current Assets2.7B3.2B3.3B3.0B2.9B1.4B
Net Debt171.4M511.2M488.2M(165.1M)809.3M584.1M
Short Term Debt25M125.9M162.6M138.7M141.0M80.9M
Long Term Debt592.7M1.0B662.5M674.5M594.9M560.6M

Under Armour ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Under Armour's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Under Armour's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Under Armour Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Under Armour C's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Under Armour using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Under Armour C based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
Check out Under Armour Piotroski F Score and Under Armour Altman Z Score analysis.
You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.
Is Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Under Armour. If investors know Under will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Under Armour listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.686
Earnings Share
(0.04)
Revenue Per Share
12.41
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.11)
Return On Assets
0.0284
The market value of Under Armour C is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Under that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Under Armour's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Under Armour's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Under Armour's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Under Armour's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Under Armour's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Under Armour is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Under Armour's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.