Piper Short Term Debt vs Treasury Stock Analysis
PIPR Stock | USD 340.71 1.02 0.30% |
Piper Sandler financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just breaking down Piper Sandler Companies prevalent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Piper Sandler Companies is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Piper Sandler Short Term Debt and its Treasury Stock accounts. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Piper Sandler Companies. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in american community survey.
Short Term Debt vs Treasury Stock
Short Term Debt vs Treasury Stock Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Piper Sandler Companies Short Term Debt account and Treasury Stock. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have strong relationship.
The correlation between Piper Sandler's Short Term Debt and Treasury Stock is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Short Term Debt that can explain the historical movement of Treasury Stock in the same time period over historical financial statements of Piper Sandler Companies, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Piper Sandler's Short Term Debt and Treasury Stock is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Short Term Debt of Piper Sandler Companies are associated (or correlated) with its Treasury Stock. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Treasury Stock has no effect on the direction of Short Term Debt i.e., Piper Sandler's Short Term Debt and Treasury Stock go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.68 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Significant |
Short Term Debt
Treasury Stock
Most indicators from Piper Sandler's fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Piper Sandler Companies current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Piper Sandler Companies. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in american community survey. As of 11/22/2024, Discontinued Operations is likely to grow to about 28.7 M, while Selling General Administrative is likely to drop slightly above 557.4 M.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Interest Expense | 10.7M | 9.5M | 10.1M | 9.6M | Depreciation And Amortization | 1.6B | 1.3B | 1.2B | 1.3B |
Piper Sandler fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Piper Sandler Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Piper Sandler fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 1.6B | 2.0B | 2.6B | 2.2B | 2.1B | 1.7B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 282.1M | 294.5M | 214.6M | 234.8M | 123.7M | 117.5M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 731.3M | 829.4M | 1.1B | 1.1B | 1.1B | 841.5M | |
Net Debt | 32.1M | (213.5M) | (756.3M) | (130.9M) | (259.4M) | (246.4M) | |
Other Assets | 304.9M | 269.7M | 336.0M | 940.7M | 784.9M | 552.3M | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 13.9M | 14.9M | 17.0M | 17.0M | 17.2M | 13.2M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 1.6B | 2.0B | 2.6B | 2.2B | 2.1B | 1.7B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 232.2M | 294.5M | 214.6M | 736.5M | 841.5M | 883.6M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 214.6M | 558.4M | 612.8M | 603.1M | 631.8M | 448.0M | |
Total Liab | 822.2M | 1.1B | 1.3B | 927.5M | 841.5M | 1.0B | |
Other Current Liab | (57.5M) | 62.3M | 63.1M | (195.6M) | (153.7M) | (146.0M) | |
Total Current Liabilities | 57.5M | 18.6M | 13.2M | 191.0M | 123.7M | 117.5M | |
Cash | 250.0M | 507.9M | 971.0M | 365.6M | 383.1M | 197.4M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 250.0M | 507.9M | 971.0M | 365.6M | 383.1M | 197.4M | |
Total Current Assets | 557.3M | 769.7M | 1.3B | 648.1M | 628.8M | 497.8M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 69.9M | 126.4M | 123.1M | 156.0M | 130.2M | 136.7M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 766.4M | 957.7M | 952.9M | 592.7M | 727.3M | 1.3B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | (68.0M) | (104.2M) | (158.2M) | (759.2M) | (727.3M) | (691.0M) | |
Net Receivables | 307.3M | 261.8M | 305.5M | 343.1M | 245.7M | 292.5M | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (872K) | (197K) | (964K) | (2.5M) | (894K) | (849.3K) | |
Short Term Debt | 50.0M | 99.5M | 89.6M | 109.8M | 30M | 28.5M | |
Retained Earnings | 258.7M | 271.0M | 450.2M | 453.3M | 454.4M | 256.5M | |
Other Current Assets | (434.1M) | (270.8M) | (230.4M) | (343.1M) | (628.8M) | (597.4M) | |
Accounts Payable | 7.5M | 18.6M | 13.2M | 4.6M | 979K | 930.1K | |
Inventory | 434.1M | 270.8M | 230.4M | 282.5M | 341.8M | 328.7M | |
Intangible Assets | 16.7M | 149.9M | 119.8M | 135.6M | 116.2M | 64.2M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 626.9M | 452.1M | 625.4M | 617.3M | 709.9M | 592.9M | |
Retained Earnings Total Equity | 258.7M | 271.0M | 450.2M | 453.3M | 521.3M | 261.9M | |
Capital Surpluse | 757.7M | 847.8M | 925.4M | 1.0B | 1.2B | 893.8M | |
Long Term Investments | 639.8M | 401.6M | 349.0M | 340.0M | 721.5M | 707.2M | |
Treasury Stock | (284.4M) | (289.4M) | (312.6M) | (441.7M) | (397.5M) | (417.4M) | |
Non Current Liabilities Other | 242.6M | 250.5M | 218.3M | 170.6M | 153.5M | 145.9M | |
Property Plant Equipment | 29.9M | 43.8M | 51.8M | 68.2M | 78.5M | 82.4M | |
Noncontrolling Interest In Consolidated Entity | 75.2M | 96.7M | 164.6M | 200.0M | 229.9M | 241.4M |
Pair Trading with Piper Sandler
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Piper Sandler position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Piper Sandler will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Piper Stock
0.81 | V | Visa Class A | PairCorr |
0.77 | DHIL | Diamond Hill Investment | PairCorr |
0.88 | DIST | Distoken Acquisition | PairCorr |
0.73 | AB | AllianceBernstein | PairCorr |
0.75 | AC | Associated Capital | PairCorr |
Moving against Piper Stock
0.7 | XP | Xp Inc | PairCorr |
0.69 | WU | Western Union | PairCorr |
0.66 | PT | Pintec Technology | PairCorr |
0.41 | RM | Regional Management Corp | PairCorr |
0.32 | DMYY | dMY Squared Technology | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Piper Sandler could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Piper Sandler when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Piper Sandler - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Piper Sandler Companies to buy it.
The correlation of Piper Sandler is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Piper Sandler moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Piper Sandler Companies moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Piper Sandler can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Piper Stock Analysis
When running Piper Sandler's price analysis, check to measure Piper Sandler's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Piper Sandler is operating at the current time. Most of Piper Sandler's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Piper Sandler's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Piper Sandler's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Piper Sandler to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.