Correlation Between Regional Management and Piper Sandler

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Regional Management and Piper Sandler at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Regional Management and Piper Sandler into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Regional Management Corp and Piper Sandler Companies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Regional Management and Piper Sandler and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Regional Management with a short position of Piper Sandler. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Regional Management and Piper Sandler.

Diversification Opportunities for Regional Management and Piper Sandler

-0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Regional and Piper is -0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Regional Management Corp and Piper Sandler Companies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Piper Sandler Companies and Regional Management is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Regional Management Corp are associated (or correlated) with Piper Sandler. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Piper Sandler Companies has no effect on the direction of Regional Management i.e., Regional Management and Piper Sandler go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Regional Management and Piper Sandler

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Regional Management is expected to generate 3.4 times less return on investment than Piper Sandler. In addition to that, Regional Management is 1.32 times more volatile than Piper Sandler Companies. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Piper Sandler Companies is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  13,289  in Piper Sandler Companies on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  21,592  from holding Piper Sandler Companies or generate 162.48% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Regional Management Corp  vs.  Piper Sandler Companies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Regional Management Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Regional Management Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, Regional Management is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Piper Sandler Companies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Piper Sandler Companies are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively weak basic indicators, Piper Sandler reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Regional Management and Piper Sandler Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Regional Management and Piper Sandler

The main advantage of trading using opposite Regional Management and Piper Sandler positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Regional Management position performs unexpectedly, Piper Sandler can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Piper Sandler will offset losses from the drop in Piper Sandler's long position.
The idea behind Regional Management Corp and Piper Sandler Companies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format