Restaurant Historical Cash Flow
| QSP-UN Stock | CAD 87.97 0.86 0.99% |
Analysis of Restaurant Brands cash flow over time is an excellent tool to project Restaurant Brands future capital expenditures as well as to predict the amount of cash needed to cover cost of sales, R&D expenses or production expansions. Investors should almost always look for trends in cash flow indicators such as Depreciation of 176 M or Dividends Paid of 668.3 M as it is a great indicator of Restaurant Brands ability to facilitate future growth, repay debt on time or pay out dividends.
Financial Statement Analysis is much more than just reviewing and examining Restaurant Brands latest accounting reports to predict its past. Macroaxis encourages investors to analyze financial statements over time for various trends across multiple indicators and accounts to determine whether Restaurant Brands is a good buy for the upcoming year.
Restaurant |
About Restaurant Cash Flow Analysis
The Cash Flow Statement is a financial statement that shows how changes in Restaurant balance sheet and income statement accounts affect cash and cash equivalents. It breaks the analysis down to operating, investing, and financing activities. One of the most critical aspects of the cash flow statement is liquidity, which is the degree to which Restaurant's non-liquid assets can be easily converted into cash.
Restaurant Brands Cash Flow Chart
Add Fundamental
Stock Based Compensation
Compensation provided to employees in the form of equity or options to purchase company stock. This type of compensation is used to align the interests of employees and shareholders.Free Cash Flow
The amount of cash a company generates after accounting for cash outflows to support operations and maintain its capital assets.Begin Period Cash Flow
The amount of cash a company has at the beginning of a financial reporting period. It serves as the starting point for calculating the period's cash flow from operations, investing, and financing activities.Dividends Paid
The total amount of dividends that a company has paid out to its shareholders over a specific period.Most accounts from Restaurant Brands' cash flow statement are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing cash flow statement accounts one by one will only give a small insight into Restaurant Brands current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of cash flow statement accounts, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. At present, Restaurant Brands' Stock Based Compensation is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Net Income is expected to grow to about 2.1 B, whereas Change To Inventory is projected to grow to (36.8 M).
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (projected) | Free Cash Flow | 1.4B | 1.2B | 1.4B | 1.1B | Stock Based Compensation | 136M | 194M | 223.1M | 234.3M |
Restaurant Brands cash flow statement Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Restaurant Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Restaurant Brands cash flow statement Accounts
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (projected) | ||
| Change To Inventory | (10M) | 12M | (61M) | (43M) | (38.7M) | (36.8M) | |
| Change In Cash | 27M | (473M) | 91M | (39M) | (35.1M) | (33.3M) | |
| Stock Based Compensation | 84M | 102M | 136M | 194M | 223.1M | 234.3M | |
| Free Cash Flow | 804M | 1.6B | 1.4B | 1.2B | 1.4B | 1.1B | |
| Change In Working Capital | (184M) | 158M | (310M) | (237M) | (213.3M) | (202.6M) | |
| Begin Period Cash Flow | 1.5B | 1.6B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.4B | 1.2B | |
| Other Cashflows From Financing Activities | 4.8B | (74M) | 54M | 93M | 83.7M | 79.5M | |
| Depreciation | 189M | 201M | 190M | 191M | 219.7M | 176M | |
| Other Non Cash Items | (77M) | 300M | 17M | 52M | (101.7M) | (96.6M) | |
| Dividends Paid | 959M | 974M | 971M | 990M | 1.1B | 668.3M | |
| Capital Expenditures | 117M | 106M | 100M | 120M | 138M | 82.8M | |
| Total Cash From Operating Activities | 921M | 1.7B | 1.5B | 1.3B | 1.5B | 1.2B | |
| Change To Account Receivables | (30M) | 8M | (110M) | (147M) | (132.3M) | (125.7M) | |
| Net Income | 750M | 1.3B | 1.5B | 1.7B | 2.0B | 2.1B | |
| Total Cash From Financing Activities | (821M) | (1.1B) | (1.3B) | (1.4B) | (1.2B) | (1.2B) | |
| End Period Cash Flow | 1.6B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.3B | 1.3B | |
| Sale Purchase Of Stock | 5.2B | (551M) | (326M) | (500M) | (575M) | (546.3M) | |
| Net Borrowings | (16M) | 527M | 446M | (92M) | (105.8M) | (100.5M) | |
| Total Cashflows From Investing Activities | (30M) | (79M) | (1.1B) | (64M) | (57.6M) | (60.5M) | |
| Change To Operating Activities | 27M | 7M | (31M) | (334M) | (300.6M) | (285.6M) | |
| Other Cashflows From Investing Activities | 24M | 26M | (9M) | 36M | 32.4M | 30.8M | |
| Change To Netincome | 82M | 174M | 111M | 129M | 148.4M | 155.8M | |
| Change To Liabilities | 112M | (183M) | 149M | 169M | 152.1M | 159.7M | |
| Investments | (79M) | (1.1B) | (64M) | (9M) | (10.4M) | (10.9M) |
Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Restaurant Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.