Halliburton Net Worth
Halliburton Net Worth Breakdown | HAL |
Halliburton Net Worth Analysis
Halliburton's net worth analysis, or its valuation, is the process of determining the total value of the company. This involves assessing a range of factors, including Halliburton's financial performance, assets, liabilities, and potential for growth. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear understanding of Halliburton's overall worth, which can help investors make informed investment decisions. There are several methods that can be used to perform Halliburton's net worth analysis. One common approach is to calculate Halliburton's market capitalization.Another approach is to use the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio), which compares Halliburton's stock price to its earnings per share (EPS). Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is another popular method for assessing Halliburton's net worth. This approach calculates the present value of Halliburton's future cash flows, taking into account factors such as growth rate, profitability, and risk. By comparing the present value of Halliburton's cash flows to its current stock price, investors can gain a better understanding of the company's overall value. Finally, investors may use comparable company analysis to evaluate Halliburton's net worth. This involves comparing Halliburton's financial metrics to similar companies in the same industry. By identifying companies with similar financial characteristics, investors can gain insight into Halliburton's net worth relative to its peers.
Enterprise Value |
|
To determine if Halliburton is a good investment, evaluating the company's potential for future growth is also very important. This may include expanding into new markets, launching new products or services, or improving operational efficiency. Companies with strong growth prospects can be more attractive investments. This aspect of the research should be conducted in the context of the overall market and industry in which the company operates and should include an analysis of growth potential, competitive landscape, and any regulatory or economic factors that could impact the business. Some of the essential points regarding Halliburton's net worth research are outlined below:
| Halliburton generated a negative expected return over the last 90 days | |
| Halliburton is unlikely to experience financial distress in the next 2 years | |
| Halliburton has a strong financial position based on the latest SEC filings | |
| Over 87.0% of the company shares are owned by institutional investors | |
| On 26th of December 2024 Halliburton paid $ 0.17 per share dividend to its current shareholders | |
| Latest headline from gurufocus.com: Decoding Halliburton Co A Strategic SWOT Insight |
Halliburton Quarterly Good Will |
|
Halliburton uses earnings reports to provide investors with an update of all three financial statements, including the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement. Therefore, it is also crucial when considering investing in Halliburton. Every quarterly earnings report provides investors with an overview of sales, expenses, and net income for the most recent period. It also may provide a comparison to Halliburton's previous reporting period. The quarterly earnings reports are usually disseminated to the public via Form 10-Q, which is a legal document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission every quarter.
| 23rd of April 2024 Upcoming Quarterly Report | View | |
| 17th of July 2024 Next Financial Report | View | |
| 31st of March 2024 Next Fiscal Quarter End | View | |
| 28th of January 2025 Next Fiscal Year End | View | |
| 31st of December 2023 Last Quarter Report | View | |
| 31st of December 2023 Last Financial Announcement | View |
Halliburton Target Price Consensus
Halliburton target price is determined by taking all analyst projections and averaging them out. There is no one specific way to measure analysts' performance other than comparing it to past results via a very sophisticated attribution analysis. Halliburton's target price projections below should be used in combination with other traditional price prediction techniques such as stock price forecasting, investor sentiment analysis, technical analysis, earnings estimate, and various momentum models.
| 30 | Strong Buy |
Most Halliburton analysts issue ratings four times a year, at intervals of three months. Ratings are usually accompanied by a target price to help potential investors understand Halliburton stock's fair price compared to its market value. Analysts arrive at stock ratings after researching the public financial statements of Halliburton, talking to its executives and customers, or listening to those companies' conference calls.
Macroaxis Advice Exposure ValuationHalliburton Target Price Projection
Halliburton's current and average target prices are 26.16 and 37.13, respectively. The current price of Halliburton is the price at which Halliburton is currently trading. On the other hand, Halliburton's target price is what analysts think the stock is worth or could sell for in the future. The more significant the discrepancy between the two prices, the more it stimulates investors to act.Current Price
Halliburton Market Quote on 16th of February 2025
Target Price
Analyst Consensus On Halliburton Target Price
Know Halliburton's Top Institutional Investors
Have you ever been surprised when a price of an equity instrument such as Halliburton is soaring high without any particular reason? This is usually happening because many institutional investors are aggressively trading Halliburton backward and forwards among themselves. Halliburton's institutional investor refers to the entity that pools money to purchase Halliburton's securities or originate loans. Institutional investors include commercial and private banks, credit unions, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, endowments, and mutual funds. Operating companies that invest excess capital in these types of assets may also be included in the term and may influence corporate governance by exercising voting rights in their investments.
| Shares | Jpmorgan Chase & Co | 2024-09-30 | 10.2 M | Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc | 2024-09-30 | 9.4 M | Amvescap Plc. | 2024-09-30 | 9.1 M | Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 2024-09-30 | 8.9 M | Northern Trust Corp | 2024-09-30 | 7.9 M | T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. | 2024-09-30 | 7.4 M | Legal & General Group Plc | 2024-09-30 | 7.1 M | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2024-12-31 | 6.9 M | Ubs Asset Mgmt Americas Inc | 2024-09-30 | 5.7 M | Capital World Investors | 2024-09-30 | 114.2 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2024-09-30 | 105.2 M |
Follow Halliburton's market capitalization trends
The company currently falls under 'Large-Cap' category with a total capitalization of 22.71 B.Market Cap |
|
Project Halliburton's profitablity
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.11 | 0.12 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.20 | 0.21 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.10 | 0.10 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.24 | 0.25 |
When accessing Halliburton's net worth, it's important to look at multiple sources and consider different scenarios. For example, gross profit margin measures Halliburton's profitability after accounting for the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin measures profitability after accounting for all expenses. Other important metrics include return on assets, return on equity, and free cash flow. By reviewing multiple sources and metrics, you can gain a complete picture of Halliburton's profitability and make more informed investment decisions.
Evaluate Halliburton's management efficiency
Halliburton has Return on Asset of 0.0976 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0976 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2518 %, implying that it generated $0.2518 on every 100 dollars invested. Halliburton's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Halliburton manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is expected to rise to 0.12 this year. Return On Capital Employed is expected to rise to 0.21 this year. At this time, Halliburton's Asset Turnover is quite stable compared to the past year.| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Book Value Per Share | 11.96 | 6.28 | |
| Tangible Book Value Per Share | 8.74 | 5.15 | |
| Enterprise Value Over EBITDA | 5.99 | 10.67 | |
| Price Book Value Ratio | 2.28 | 2.38 | |
| Enterprise Value Multiple | 5.99 | 10.67 | |
| Price Fair Value | 2.28 | 2.38 | |
| Enterprise Value | 7.7 B | 4.6 B |
Evaluating the management effectiveness of Halliburton allows investors to assess its financial health and operational efficiency. Coupled with an analysis of its growth prospects and the current market dynamics, we evaluate the stock's true value and future potential. Key indicators such as revenue, earnings or debt levels are examined alongside external factors like economic trends and regulatory changes. The Halliburton Stock analysis seeks to determine whether the stock is undervalued, appropriately priced, or overvalued, thereby guiding your investment decisions.
Enterprise Value Revenue 1.2506 | Revenue | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.02) | Revenue Per Share | Return On Equity |
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Halliburton insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Halliburton's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases Halliburton insiders are required to file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
milton Carroll over three months ago Acquisition by milton Carroll of 1323 shares of Halliburton subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Eric Carre over three months ago Disposition of 66423 shares by Eric Carre of Halliburton at 34.96 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Myrtle Jones over six months ago Disposition of 368 shares by Myrtle Jones of Halliburton at 36.57 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Myrtle Jones over six months ago Disposition of 25479 shares by Myrtle Jones of Halliburton at 36.92 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Weiss Janet L over six months ago Disposition of 3807 shares by Weiss Janet L of Halliburton subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Halliburton Corporate Filings
| 13th of February 2025 Other Reports | ViewVerify | |
F4 | 12th of February 2025 The report filed by a party regarding the acquisition or disposition of a company's common stock, as well as derivative securities such as options, warrants, and convertible securities | ViewVerify |
8K | 22nd of January 2025 Report filed with the SEC to announce major events that shareholders should know about | ViewVerify |
13A | 12th of November 2024 An amended filing to the original Schedule 13G | ViewVerify |
Halliburton Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Halliburton's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Halliburton is estimated to be 0.607 with the future projection ranging from a low of 0.59 to a high of 0.65. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Halliburton is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
0.59 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.65 Highest |
Halliburton Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Halliburton's value are higher than the current market price of the Halliburton stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Halliburton is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Halliburton's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2025 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 30 | 95.61% | 0.7 | 0.607 | 2.83 |
Halliburton Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Halliburton refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Halliburton predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Halliburton, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Halliburton Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Halliburton, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Halliburton should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Halliburton Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Halliburton's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-01-21 | 2024-12-31 | 0.6952 | 0.7 | 0.0048 | 0 | ||
2024-10-22 | 2024-09-30 | 0.76 | 0.73 | -0.03 | 3 | ||
2024-07-19 | 2024-06-30 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2024-04-23 | 2024-03-31 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2024-01-23 | 2023-12-31 | 0.8 | 0.86 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
2023-10-24 | 2023-09-30 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2023-07-19 | 2023-06-30 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2023-04-25 | 2023-03-31 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 7 | ||
2023-01-24 | 2022-12-31 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 7 | ||
2022-10-25 | 2022-09-30 | 0.56 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2022-07-19 | 2022-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.04 | 8 | ||
2022-04-19 | 2022-03-31 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2022-01-24 | 2021-12-31 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2021-10-19 | 2021-09-30 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2021-07-20 | 2021-06-30 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
2021-04-21 | 2021-03-31 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
2021-01-19 | 2020-12-31 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 20 | ||
2020-10-19 | 2020-09-30 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 37 | ||
2020-07-20 | 2020-06-30 | -0.11 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 145 | ||
2020-04-20 | 2020-03-31 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 29 | ||
2020-01-21 | 2019-12-31 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2019-10-21 | 2019-09-30 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2019-07-22 | 2019-06-30 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 0.05 | 16 | ||
2019-04-22 | 2019-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2019-01-22 | 2018-12-31 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2018-10-22 | 2018-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2018-07-23 | 2018-06-30 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2018-04-23 | 2018-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2018-01-22 | 2017-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.07 | 15 | ||
2017-10-23 | 2017-09-30 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 13 | ||
2017-07-24 | 2017-06-30 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.09 | 50 | ||
2017-04-24 | 2017-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 33 | ||
2017-01-23 | 2016-12-31 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 100 | ||
2016-10-19 | 2016-09-30 | -0.06 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 116 | ||
2016-07-20 | 2016-06-30 | -0.19 | -0.14 | 0.05 | 26 | ||
2016-05-03 | 2016-03-31 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 75 | ||
2016-01-25 | 2015-12-31 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 29 | ||
2015-10-19 | 2015-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 14 | ||
2015-07-20 | 2015-06-30 | 0.29 | 0.38 | 0.09 | 31 | ||
2015-04-20 | 2015-03-31 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.12 | 32 | ||
2015-01-20 | 2014-12-31 | 1.1 | 1.19 | 0.09 | 8 | ||
2014-10-20 | 2014-09-30 | 1.1 | 1.19 | 0.09 | 8 | ||
2014-07-21 | 2014-06-30 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-04-21 | 2014-03-31 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2014-01-21 | 2013-12-31 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2013-10-21 | 2013-09-30 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-07-22 | 2013-06-30 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-04-22 | 2013-03-31 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2013-01-25 | 2012-12-31 | 0.6 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2012-10-17 | 2012-09-30 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2012-07-23 | 2012-06-30 | 0.75 | 0.8 | 0.05 | 6 | ||
2012-04-18 | 2012-03-31 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2012-01-23 | 2011-12-31 | 0.99 | 1.0 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2011-10-17 | 2011-09-30 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2011-07-18 | 2011-06-30 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.07 | 9 | ||
2011-04-18 | 2011-03-31 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2011-01-24 | 2010-12-31 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.05 | 7 | ||
2010-10-18 | 2010-09-30 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2010-07-19 | 2010-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 40 | ||
2010-04-19 | 2010-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 12 | ||
2010-01-25 | 2009-12-31 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2009-10-16 | 2009-09-30 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.03 | 11 | ||
2009-07-20 | 2009-06-30 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2009-04-20 | 2009-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2009-01-26 | 2008-12-31 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.09 | 12 | ||
2008-10-20 | 2008-09-30 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2008-07-22 | 2008-06-30 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2008-04-21 | 2008-03-31 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2008-01-28 | 2007-12-31 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2007-10-21 | 2007-09-30 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2007-07-23 | 2007-06-30 | 0.56 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-01-26 | 2006-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2006-10-22 | 2006-09-30 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2006-07-20 | 2006-06-30 | 0.49 | 0.48 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2006-04-20 | 2006-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2006-01-26 | 2005-12-31 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.07 | 15 | ||
2005-10-24 | 2005-09-30 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-07-21 | 2005-06-30 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.1 | 35 | ||
2005-04-21 | 2005-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 31 | ||
2005-01-28 | 2004-12-31 | 0.24 | 0.22 | -0.02 | 8 | ||
2004-10-26 | 2004-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
2004-07-23 | 2004-06-30 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
2004-04-28 | 2004-03-31 | 0.15 | 0.14 | -0.01 | 6 | ||
2004-01-29 | 2003-12-31 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
2003-10-29 | 2003-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 14 | ||
2003-07-31 | 2003-06-30 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 200 | ||
2003-04-29 | 2003-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.06 | -0.04 | 40 | ||
2003-02-20 | 2002-12-31 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-11-07 | 2002-09-30 | 0.1 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 40 | ||
2002-07-24 | 2002-06-30 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
2002-05-07 | 2002-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-01-23 | 2001-12-31 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
2001-10-23 | 2001-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-07-25 | 2001-06-30 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 13 | ||
2001-04-25 | 2001-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.1 | -0.01 | 9 | ||
2001-01-30 | 2000-12-31 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2000-10-24 | 2000-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.12 | -0.02 | 14 | ||
2000-07-26 | 2000-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.06 | -0.01 | 14 | ||
2000-04-26 | 2000-03-31 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-01-27 | 1999-12-31 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
1999-10-21 | 1999-09-30 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 16 | ||
1999-07-22 | 1999-06-30 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 11 | ||
1999-04-26 | 1999-03-31 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-01-25 | 1998-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.1 | -0.04 | 28 | ||
1998-10-29 | 1998-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
1998-07-22 | 1998-06-30 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
1998-04-22 | 1998-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.22 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
1998-01-22 | 1997-12-31 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
1997-10-22 | 1997-09-30 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
1997-07-23 | 1997-06-30 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-04-23 | 1997-03-31 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-01-22 | 1996-12-31 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 10 | ||
1996-10-22 | 1996-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
1996-07-23 | 1996-06-30 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-04-22 | 1996-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.0 | 0 |
Halliburton Corporate Directors
| Abdulaziz Khayyal | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Patricia Hall | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Robert Malone | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| Alan Bennett | Independent Director | Profile |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Halliburton. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation. For more information on how to buy Halliburton Stock please use our How to buy in Halliburton Stock guide.You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.
Is Oil & Gas Equipment & Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Halliburton. If investors know Halliburton will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Halliburton listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.04) | Dividend Share 0.68 | Earnings Share 2.83 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.02) |
The market value of Halliburton is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Halliburton that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Halliburton's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Halliburton's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Halliburton's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Halliburton's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Halliburton's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Halliburton is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Halliburton's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.